Because labor-related obligations in existing U.S. trade agreements are general and largely hortatory, few enforcement actions have been taken with regard to these obligations. The labor obligations in the Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States and Canada (“USMCA” or “Agreement”), however, are specific and likely to be enforced. In fact, unprecedented support of the USMCA by U.S. labor unions suggests that they are likely to press this and future administrations to vigorously enforce USMCA labor obligations, especially with regard to Mexico. Companies doing business in Mexico or sourcing goods from Mexico should understand USMCA’s labor obligations and develop compliance plans in preparation for entry into force of the Agreement.

Background

President Trump is set to sign the implementing legislation this week, which finalizes the United States’ ratification of the Agreement. Based on the terms of the Agreement, the USMCA will enter into force three months after the last notification is received by the Parties indicating that each Party has “completed the internal procedures required for entry into force.” Although it is unclear precisely when the USMCA will enter into force because many of the implementation requirements are still being worked out by the Parties, we think that companies should be prepared for the Administration’s enforcement of the new labor provisions.

The USMCA contains significant new labor-related provisions, including the:

  1. Requirement for Mexico to pass legislation recognizing the right of workers to engage in collective bargaining.
  2. First of its kind “Facility-specific Enforcement Mechanism” that is a rapid response mechanism to allow complaints to be brought against facilities for violating the rights of freedom of association and collective bargaining.
  3. New enforcement and monitoring mechanisms that allow for the inspections of factories and facilities that are not living up to their labor obligations.
  4. New “labor value content” rules for the automotive sector.

Below is an overview of each of these new provisions.

Worker Representation and Collective Bargaining

The USMCA Labor Chapter contains obligations requiring all Parties to adopt and maintain in law the labor rights as recognized by the International Labor Organization (“ILO”) Declaration on Rights at Work, including core worker representation and collective bargaining rights. The Annex to the Labor Chapter also includes obligations that are specific to Mexico, such as requirements that Mexico pass legislation recognizing the right for workers to engage in collective bargaining.

Facility-specific Enforcement Mechanism, Verifications and Penalties

The USMCA includes the strongest labor rights monitoring and enforcement mechanisms in any U.S. free trade agreement concluded to date. These include the creation of a “Facility-specific, Rapid Response Labor Mechanism” established through the addition of a special Annex to the Dispute Settlement Chapter of the Agreement. Under this mechanism, a Party believing that labor rights are being denied at a particular facility in the territory of another Party may request the establishment of a panel to investigate the matter. The powers of the panel include conducting on-site verifications at the facility in question, subject to the responding Party’s consent.

Where the verification (or a lack of cooperation by the responding Party) leads to a determination that the facility in question is, in fact, failing to accord labor rights to workers, that facility may be subject to punitive measures by the foreign Party that initiated the complaint. Such measures include a suspension of preferential tariff treatment for goods manufactured at the facility, or the imposition of penalties on goods or services provided by the facility. Furthermore, where a facility found to have failed to accord labor rights is owned or controlled by the same person as other facilities producing similar goods or services with prior violations, penalties may be extended to the goods or services of all such facilities.

Labor Value Content Rule for Automobiles and Trucks

Under the Rules of Origin Chapter, in order to make preferential duty claims for imports of passenger vehicles and light and heavy trucks, the Agreement sets forth specific percentages of vehicle content that must be manufactured with a minimum hourly wage of US $16 per hour. The specific percentage required begins at 30 percent labor value content (“LVC”) and increases annually before reaching its final (fully phased-in) value of 40 percent three years after entry into force. The intent of this provision is to protect U.S. automobile manufacturing jobs and prevent the shift of manufacturing jobs to lower wage jurisdictions. The Parties are currently working on uniform regulations for the rules of origin impacting the LVC and also other origin requirements for aluminum and steel and regional value content requirements for the automotive industry.

Steps Companies Should Consider

In light of the increased scrutiny and focus on labor rights in Mexico, we recommend that companies consider taking the following actions:

  1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of their supply chain in Mexico and the labor policies and standards of their Mexican suppliers, manufacturers, and service providers.
  2. Develop a written code of conduct for suppliers and service providers in Mexico.
  3. Ensure supplier, manufacturing, and service contracts reflect USMCA labor rights obligations with risk allocated accordingly.
  4. Institute a robust internal control process to monitor compliance with the code of conduct in order to avoid loss of duty preference claims, imposition of penalties, and potential delayed or rejected shipments.
  5. The automotive sector should continue to review LVC as the Parties to the Agreement further define critical details for implementation of the LVC and create new uniform regulations.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Shara Aranoff Shara Aranoff

Shara helps clients navigate trade remedies, tariffs, and customs regulations in support of their U.S. and global market strategies.

Shara is the Chair of Covington’s International Trade Practice Group, and co-leads the Customs practice.

Drawing on her 20 years of service in the…

Shara helps clients navigate trade remedies, tariffs, and customs regulations in support of their U.S. and global market strategies.

Shara is the Chair of Covington’s International Trade Practice Group, and co-leads the Customs practice.

Drawing on her 20 years of service in the U.S. government, she develops legal and public policy strategies to assist clients engaging with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Congress, and the courts. In high-stakes antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, Shara helps global manufacturers, distributors, and retailers protect their access to the U.S. market. She assists technology, life sciences and manufacturing companies enforce and defend their intellectual property rights in cross-border Section 337 investigations. Chambers praises her for bringing “behind-the-curtain knowledge to the private sector” in proceedings before the ITC by leveraging her experience as a decision maker.

Shara also regularly advises clients in a wide range of industries on Customs compliance and tariff mitigation, including:

  • Providing legal opinions or seeking Customs rulings on classification, valuation, country of origin, and product marking/labelling.
  • Conducting internal compliance reviews, drafting compliance policies, and providing training.
  • Responding to CBP audits and inquiries and filing voluntary disclosures.
  • Developing strategies to reduce tariffs and take advantage of trusted trader programs.

Prior to joining the firm, Shara was a Commissioner and Chairman of the ITC, where she was a decision-maker in hundreds of Section 337, antidumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard investigations.

She previously served as Senior International Trade Counsel for Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) at the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, where she was responsible for legislative and policy issues including Trade Promotion Authority; negotiations involving the World Trade Organization and free trade agreements; and trade remedy and customs laws. She was also an attorney-advisor in the Office of the General Counsel at the ITC, where she was lead counsel in litigation before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Court of International Trade.

Photo of John K. Veroneau John K. Veroneau

Ambassador John Veroneau is a Chambers-ranked international trade lawyer in the firm’s International Trade Practice Group. Having served in senior positions in both Executive and Legislative branches, he provides legal and strategic advice to clients on a broad range of international trade matters.

Ambassador John Veroneau is a Chambers-ranked international trade lawyer in the firm’s International Trade Practice Group. Having served in senior positions in both Executive and Legislative branches, he provides legal and strategic advice to clients on a broad range of international trade matters. Ambassador Veroneau held Senate-confirmed positions under President Bush as Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) and USTR General Counsel, and under President Clinton as an Assistant Secretary of Defense.

Photo of Kate McNulty Kate McNulty

Kate McNulty is a senior associate in the Washington office who helps clients navigate complex international trade and investment matters, providing legal and strategic advice to clients on global policy issues and geopolitical risks. She counsels companies, trade associations, and governments on the…

Kate McNulty is a senior associate in the Washington office who helps clients navigate complex international trade and investment matters, providing legal and strategic advice to clients on global policy issues and geopolitical risks. She counsels companies, trade associations, and governments on the use of international treaties—including free trade agreements (FTAs), bilateral investment treaties (BITs), and the World Trade Organization (WTO)—to open markets and resolve disputes, also regularly advising clients on the negotiation and implementation of such agreements. She has represented corporate clients in both commercial and investment treaty arbitrations, including under ICSID, ICC, UNCITRAL, and ICDR rules, and also represents clients in proceedings before U.S. administrative bodies and U.S. courts, including in trade remedy proceedings (AD/CVD) and customs matters.

Kate also focuses her practice on U.S. anti-forced labor laws as well as business and human rights matters, advising clients on matters relating to the enforcement of Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and Withhold Release Orders (WROs). She helps clients develop and implement strategies to mitigate supply chain risks, including building compliance programs, developing due diligence procedures, and conducting risk assessments. She also advises clients on conducting human rights-related investigations and implementing related findings.

Kate also maintains an active pro bono practiced focused on international human rights, and her work includes representation of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Clooney Foundation for Justice, the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights, and journalists wrongfully detained by foreign governments.

Kate joined the firm after serving as a Foreign Affairs Officer in the Office of Multilateral Trade Affairs at the U.S. Department of State, where she managed trade enforcement and trade policy issues, and participated in the negotiation of international trade agreements on behalf of the U.S. Government.