Drug manufacturers have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic by adopting measures to ensure continuity in their operations—continuity that is vital to safeguarding the global drug supply. In doing so, some have faced unprecedented challenges with regard to ensuring the health of their employees, preventing COVID-19 transmission at their facilities, and mitigating associated risks to product safety and quality.In light of these challenges, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a guidance document on September 11, 2020, to advise manufacturers of human and animal drug and biological products on how to plan and prioritize current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) activities as they transition from operations impacted by the public health emergency to normal manufacturing operations.

The Guidance, titled “Resuming Normal Drug and Biologics Manufacturing Operations During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency,” describes FDA’s suggestions for evaluating and prioritizing the remediation of CGMP activities that were necessarily delayed, reduced, or otherwise modified during the public health emergency in order to maintain production and the drug supply.

FDA explains that, if a drug manufacturer departed from established CGMP activities impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency, the drug manufacturer should identify these deviations and any necessary remediation actions (see section I below). The drug manufacturer should evaluate these actions as part of their risk management approach (see section II). The results of the evaluation will help the drug manufacturer prioritize resumption activities (see section III).

I. Addressing Deviations from Established CGMP Activities

As explained by FDA “[r]emediation may be necessary for activities impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency that were delayed, interrupted, or reduced in frequency.” “Remediation could include a modification to an activity, a new activity, or a more comprehensive program change that mitigates the risk of a drug quality issue due to the deviation from normal operation.” The Guidance identifies considerations for assessing the need for remediation in certain contexts, including:

  • How to appropriately complete and document an unresolved investigation relating to a non-critical product or process deviation that occurred before or during the COVID-19 public health emergency.
  • Whether additional measures are needed to determine a batch’s suitability for release in situations where testing was incomplete or was accomplished under conditions that may have compromised the accuracy of the test results.
  • Whether additional measures are needed with respect to changes to, or difficulties in obtaining, materials used in drug manufacturing.
  • Whether additional measures are needed to address facility and/or equipment changes or departures from scheduled maintenance activities.

II.  Risk Management and Other Important Elements of a Plan to Resume Normal Drug Manufacturing

FDA encourages drug manufacturers to develop a resumption plan, specific to their operations and organizational needs and which accounts for the possibility of additional waves of COVID-19 infections.

Once the drug manufacturer has identified the appropriate remediation priorities, these activities should be incorporated into its resumption plan. The plan should prioritize the manufacture of drugs at risk of shortage and activities related to restarting batch production (e.g., performance of equipment maintenance prior to restarting production lines) in addition to activities that were delayed, reduced in frequency, or otherwise modified.

A plan to resume normal drug manufacturing should:

  • Include use of a risk management approach that identifies, evaluates, and mitigates factors that may impact product quality. These factors include activities performed, not performed, delayed, interrupted, or performed remotely; changes to procedures, processes, or programs; and associated outcomes. Findings and conclusions from the risk management process should be used to plan and prioritize remediation activities implemented when production activities resume.
  • Include a timeline for implementing priorities.
  • Specify that all changes be reviewed and approved by the drug manufacturer’s quality unit.
  • Specify that drug manufacturers submit the required Field Alert Reports (FARs), Biological Product Deviation Reports (BPDRs), and animal drug product/manufacturing defect and adverse drug experience reports.
  • Specify that if a drug manufacturer decides that a recall is needed, FDA should be notified as recommended in the Guidance “Product Recall, Including Removals and Corrections.”
  • Specify that applicants and drug manufacturers notify FDA of a permanent discontinuance in the manufacture of certain products or an interruption in the manufacture of certain products that is likely to lead to a meaningful disruption in supply of that product in the United States.
  • Be updated based on new information, as appropriate.

FDA notes that its CGMP regulations require manufacturers to assess whether novel pathogens—such as SARS-CoV-2—pose new risks to product safety or quality. As such, manufacturers should conduct a risk assessment to determine the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 contamination on production materials, components, drug product containers and closures, in-process materials, and drugs. This risk assessment should be approved by the manufacturer’s quality unit and documented within the manufacturer’s quality management system.

III.  Prioritize Activities to Resume Normal Drug Manufacturing

According to FDA, drug manufacturers should use the findings and conclusions drawn from the risk management approach to plan and prioritize resumption activities. “High priority should be given to drugs that are in shortage or at risk of shortage.”

FDA also notes that returning to normal operations is often a fluid process. “When production priorities change or new information impacting priorities is obtained the drug manufacturer should update the resumption plan and reprioritize activities, as appropriate.”

*     *     * 

This guidance is effective immediately, but comments may still be submitted to the Agency for consideration. Except as otherwise noted in the guidance, this version of the guidance will remain in effect for the duration of the public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. FDA may incorporate changes in the guidance, based on public comments received in response to this guidance.

If you have any questions concerning the material discussed in this client alert, please contact the following members of our Food, Drug, and Device Practice.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Thomas Cosgrove Thomas Cosgrove

Tom Cosgrove is a partner in Covington’s Food, Drug and Device Practice Group. He joined Covington in 2017 from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), where he was a senior official charged with ensuring the quality of drugs and therapeutic biologics marketed to…

Tom Cosgrove is a partner in Covington’s Food, Drug and Device Practice Group. He joined Covington in 2017 from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), where he was a senior official charged with ensuring the quality of drugs and therapeutic biologics marketed to U.S. patients. Tom brings a wealth of experience to bear in helping clients navigate the complex world of pharmaceutical compliance and enforcement in the United States and around the globe.

At FDA, Tom held senior leadership positions within the Office of Compliance in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), including leading the organization as Acting Director in 2016. Beginning in 2014, he led the Office of Manufacturing Quality (OMQ), where he was responsible for CDER’s enforcement activities covering current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) and drug quality. In this role, Tom was responsible for setting FDA’s CGMP enforcement priorities and for clearing warning letters, import alerts, and referrals for civil and criminal enforcement. He also played a central role in the FDA’s deliberations concerning the approval of marketing applications submitted by companies with manufacturing compliance challenges.

As Acting Director of CDER Compliance in 2016, Tom oversaw OMQ as well as the offices responsible for enforcing FDA’s requirements for drug approval and labeling, human drug compounding, drug supply chain security and integrity, and clinical trials and bioequivalence studies.

He is a frequent speaker at conferences and trainings focused on drug quality, compliance, and enforcement at home and abroad.

Photo of Paula Katz Paula Katz

Paula Katz is a regulatory attorney with nearly 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical and medical products compliance and enforcement matters. Prior to joining the firm, Paula was the Director of Guidance and Policy in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office…

Paula Katz is a regulatory attorney with nearly 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical and medical products compliance and enforcement matters. Prior to joining the firm, Paula was the Director of Guidance and Policy in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Manufacturing Quality. At FDA, Paula was responsible for development of current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) and drug quality policy and served as a clearing official on drug quality compliance actions. Paula brings her years of FDA experience to bear in providing clients with practical advice on a wide range of regulatory compliance and enforcement issues, including managing and responding to regulatory inspections, quality and safety reporting, regulatory outreach, product recalls, and investigations. She also routinely advises on regulatory aspects of commercial agreements and life sciences transactions and provides critical subject matter expertise to support commercial and government litigation and investigations.

Photo of Grant Dixon Grant Dixon

Grant Dixon advises a range of international clients on pharmaceutical compliance and enforcement matters. In this area, Grant regularly counsels pharmaceutical manufacturers on U.S. CGMP compliance and remediating deficiencies identified during regulatory inspections, including preparation of submissions to regulators. He also conducts internal…

Grant Dixon advises a range of international clients on pharmaceutical compliance and enforcement matters. In this area, Grant regularly counsels pharmaceutical manufacturers on U.S. CGMP compliance and remediating deficiencies identified during regulatory inspections, including preparation of submissions to regulators. He also conducts internal investigations of allegations concerning compliance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices, Current Good Clinical Practices, and other U.S. FDA regulatory requirements.

Grant also represents companies that manufacture feed, feed ingredients, drugs, biologics and medical devices for animals, those that provide veterinary medical services and that perform biomedical research, as well as clients in related industries.

Photo of Cory Trio Cory Trio

Cory Trio is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office where he is a member of the Food, Drug, and Device Practice Group. He advises food, device, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology companies on a variety of regulatory and compliance issues.