On 28 October 2022, the European Commission (the “Commission”) adopted the  second amendment to its Temporary Crisis Framework for State Aid measures to support the economy following the aggression against Ukraine by Russia (the “Framework”). The second amendment to the Framework extends its duration by one year until 31 December 2023.

The four most important things you need to know about this amendment are:

  • Maximum aid amounts have been increased;
  • Guarantees or subsidised interests can now cover larger amounts of loans when taken by large energy utilities companies that provide financial collateral for trading activities on energy markets. Exceptionally, guarantees can also be provided as unfunded financial collateral directly to central counterparts or clearing members to cover the liquidity needs of energy companies, to clear their trading activities on energy markets;
  • To achieve the EU targets of reducing electricity consumption in response to high energy prices, Member States may provide compensation for genuine reductions in electricity consumption; and
  • State recapitalisations are not subject to detailed rules as under the COVID-19 Temporary Framework, however the Commission highlights the general principles it will use to assess them on a case-by-case basis. 

Increased amount of aid

  • The amendment quadruples the amount of aid that Member States may grant to companies affected by the crisis to €2 million. In the agricultural and fisheries sectors, the amounts are raised to €250,000 and €300,000, respectively.
  • The conditions under which compensation for additional costs due to exceptionally severe increases in natural gas and electricity prices can be granted have been relaxed. The amendment increases the maximum amount of aid that can be granted from €2 million to €4 million. Now, 50% of the eligible costs can be covered by the aid, compared to 30% previously, and up to 70% of the previous consumption can be used as a reference to determine the additional costs (in contrast to the 60% initially provided for).
  • For beneficiaries suffering from a reduction in economic performance, the aid could even reach up to €100 million.
  • Maximum aid for energy-intensive users is increased from €25 million to  €50 million. The maximum aid amount is increased from €50 million to €150 million for energy-intensive users active in a particularly affected sector, such as the production of aluminium and other metals, glass fibres, pulp, fertilizer or hydrogen and many basic chemicals.

Coverage of collaterals for trading activities on energy markets

  • Whereas the Framework already allows Member States to guarantee loans, including for trading activities on energy markets, it nevertheless limits the amount of loans for which a guarantee can be granted. The Framework provides a similar limitation for subsidised loans. These limitations have been lifted for large companies providing financial collateral for trading activities on energy markets, subject to there being an appropriate justification.
  • Furthermore, Member States may exceptionally provide a guarantee as unfunded financial collateral directly to central counterparts or clearing members to cover the liquidity needs of energy companies, to clear their trading activities on energy markets.

Compensation for electricity reduction consumption

  • To compensate companies for the electricity consumption reduction needed to reach the targets imposed on EU Member States under Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices (see our blog post), Member States may establish aid schemes in compliance with existing State aid rules, or with the following conditions as set out in the amendment:
    • the aid must provide financial compensation only where the amount of electricity consumed is lower than expected. Whether consumption reduction is genuine may be verified through different methodologies, account being taken of high price incentives to reduce consumption, incentives from other payments or schemes (e.g. subsidies previously received to improve the energy efficiency of a building), weather conditions, or “gaming risks”;
    • the aid must contribute to reaching the targets of reducing electricity consumption by 5% in peak hours or 10% overall;
    • the aid must be granted following a competitive bidding process;
    • beneficiaries will be selected based on the lowest unit cost of additional consumption reduction (in EUR/MWh), and overcompensation must be clawed-back; and
    • beneficiaries must commit not to increase their overall gas consumption and not to consume off-peak more than a certain proportion of the compensated electricity consumption reduction in peak hours.

Solvency support

Contrary to the temporary framework that the Commission adopted to address the COVID-19 outbreak (the “COVID-19 Temporary Framework”), the amendment does not devote a specific section to solvency support. It does however provide general principles relating to how the Commission will assess, on a case-by-case basis, the solvency support provided to address the financial needs of companies that would otherwise cease or downsize operations and threaten markets of systemic importance. These principles are:

  • the aid must be necessary, appropriate and proportionate, without exceeding the minimum needed to ensure the viability of the company;
  • the aid cannot be granted to a company in a group, unless it can be demonstrated that the company’s difficulties are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group, and that the difficulties are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself;
  • the State must be appropriately remunerated;
  • measures to mitigate competition distortions must be taken, such as divestments, bans on bonuses, bans on dividend payments or bans on acquisitions, as laid down in the 2014 Rescue and Restructuring Aid Guidelines; and
  • for each beneficiary, Member States must undertake a long-term viability assessment and, where considered appropriate by the Commission, notify to the Commission for approval a restructuring plan in accordance with the Rescue and Restructuring Aid Guidelines, within a specified period of time.

The Covington team will continue to monitor the developments and keep you updated.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Johan Ysewyn Johan Ysewyn

Johan Ysewyn is widely recognised as one of Europe’s leading competition lawyers. As co-Chair of Covington’s Global Competition/Antitrust Practice, Johan brings over three decades of experience advising global corporates and financial institutions on their most complex and high-stakes competition and regulatory matters.

Clients…

Johan Ysewyn is widely recognised as one of Europe’s leading competition lawyers. As co-Chair of Covington’s Global Competition/Antitrust Practice, Johan brings over three decades of experience advising global corporates and financial institutions on their most complex and high-stakes competition and regulatory matters.

Clients turn to Johan for clear, strategic guidance on merger control, cartel and monopolisation investigations, and other antitrust enforcement actions. His approach is pragmatic and solution-driven, combining deep legal insight with a commercial understanding of his clients’ business.

Leading directories consistently highlight Johan’s exceptional skill and client service: Chambers Global describes him as “an exceptional lawyer who is solution-oriented, has a remarkable ability to rapidly understand our business and has excellent reactivity.” Who’s Who Legal praises his “energy and insight into cartel proceedings,” while Legal 500 calls him “one of the best European competition lawyers” with “a unique understanding of the EC and a very helpful network of connections across Brussels.”

Johan represents clients before competition authorities and courts around the world, leveraging his in-depth knowledge of regulatory processes and strong working relationships with key decision-makers, particularly within the European Commission’s DG COMP, who designated him as one of their Non-Governmental Advisors to the International Competition Network. His advisory practice spans the evolving intersections of competition law with ESG, digital markets, and strategic compliance.  His experience covers a wide range of sectors, including telecommunications, technology, media, financial services, healthcare, consumer goods, retail, energy, and transport.

Johan has extensive experience in global merger control, having advised on numerous complex, cross-border transactions requiring coordination across multiple jurisdictions. His recent merger work includes representing Discovery in its landmark acquisition of Warner Bros. and advising Illumina on its acquisition of Grail—both recognised as award-winning deals in the competition community. Johan’s merger practice spans a wide range of sectors, from media and technology to healthcare and energy, and he is known for navigating the most challenging regulatory reviews with strategic foresight and precision.

Renowned for his expertise in global cartel enforcement, Johan has represented immunity applicants and defendants in major cases involving industries such as financial services, consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and energy. He also advised the European Payments Council in the first European Commission investigation into standardisation agreements in the e-payments sector. A recognised thought leader, Johan co-authors the European Cartel Digest and lectures on cartel law and economics at the Brussels School of Competition.

In addition, Johan is one of Europe’s foremost practitioners in EU State aid law, advising both governments and beneficiaries. His experience includes landmark cases involving leading banks and airlines such as Fortis, KBC, Dexia, Arco, Citadele, airBaltic, and Riga Airport.

Photo of Carole Maczkovics Carole Maczkovics

Carole Maczkovics is a market leader in State aid law, with a robust background in the economic regulation of network industries (energy and transport) and in public contracting (EU subsidies, public procurement, concessions).

Carole has a proven track record of advising public and…

Carole Maczkovics is a market leader in State aid law, with a robust background in the economic regulation of network industries (energy and transport) and in public contracting (EU subsidies, public procurement, concessions).

Carole has a proven track record of advising public and private entities in administrative and judicial proceedings on complex State aid and regulatory matters before the European Commission as well as before the Belgian and European courts. She also advises clients on the application of the EU Foreign Subsidy Regulation (FSR) and UK subsidy control regime.

Carole has published many articles on State aid law and on the FSR, and contributes to conferences and seminars on a regular basis. She is a professor at the Brussels School of Competition on the application of regulation and competition law (including State aid) in the railway sector. Carole further gives lectures to King’s College London LLM students and trainings on State aid law at EFE, in Paris. She also acts as Academic Director of the European State aid Law Institute (EStALI).

Recognized as a leading EU State aid practitioner by Chambers Europe, and as Thought Leader in Lexology Index: Competition – State aid, Carole is praised by clients as being “really knowledgeable, approachable and very structured,” and having “in-depth knowledge and experience in state aid matters.”