In August 2022, the Chips and Science Act—a massive, $280 billion bill to boost public and private sector investments in critical and emerging technologies—became law.  We followed the bill from the beginning and anticipated significant opportunities for industry to inform and influence the direction of the new law’s programs. 

One such opportunity is available now.  The U.S. Department of Commerce recently published a request for information (RFI) “to inform the planning and design of the Regional Technology and Innovation Hub (Tech Hubs) program.”  The public comment period ends March 16, 2023.

Background

The Chips and Science Act authorized $10 billion for the U.S. Department of Commerce to establish a Regional Technology and Innovation Hub (Tech Hubs) program.  Specifically, Commerce was charged with designating at least 20 Tech Hubs and awarding grants to consortia composed of one or more institutions of higher education, political subdivisions, state governments, and “industry or firms in relevant technology, innovation, or manufacturing sectors” to develop and deploy critical technologies in those hubs.  $500 million has already been made available for the program, and Commerce will administer the program through the Economic Development Administration (EDA).

RFI

Commerce’s RFI provides important insight on how the Administration is thinking about the Tech Hubs.  The RFI characterizes the program as an “economic development initiative” and suggests that the purpose of the program is to drive technology and innovation and create jobs.  Stakeholders interested in influencing and applying for the program should keep this framing in mind.

The RFI also provides high-level information about how the agency plans to approach the Tech Hubs grant-making process.  It states “EDA intends to run a rigorous, fair, and evidence-driven competition” informed by stakeholders and “to aim for the strongest geographic and demographic diversity among hubs.”

Commerce’s RFI includes 22 specific questions across three categories:  hub characteristics, program design, and program administration.

  • Tech Hubs Characteristics:  The questions in this section focus on factors EDA should consider as it designates Tech Hubs and key performance indicators of successful Tech Hubs. 
  • Tech Hubs Program Design:  The questions in this section focus on how the program should be structured, funded, and supported now and over time.
  • Tech Hubs Administration:  The questions in this section also focus on key performance indicators of successful Tech Hubs, as well as how EDA can best continue to engage with stakeholders to inform the implementation of the program. 

This RFI represents a significant opportunity for stakeholders to inform and influence the structure and administration the Tech Hubs program.  Companies, universities, non-profits, think tanks, and other stakeholders interested in influencing or participating in the program and companies generally involved in the research, development, and commercialization of critical technologies should strongly consider participating in this public comment opportunity.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Holly Fechner Holly Fechner

Holly Fechner advises clients on complex public policy matters that combine legal and political opportunities and risks. She leads teams that represent companies, entities, and organizations in significant policy and regulatory matters before Congress and the Executive Branch.

She is a co-chair of…

Holly Fechner advises clients on complex public policy matters that combine legal and political opportunities and risks. She leads teams that represent companies, entities, and organizations in significant policy and regulatory matters before Congress and the Executive Branch.

She is a co-chair of the Covington’s Technology Industry Group and a member of the Covington Political Action Committee board of directors.

Holly works with clients to:

  • Develop compelling public policy strategies
  • Research law and draft legislation and policy
  • Draft testimony, comments, fact sheets, letters and other documents
  • Advocate before Congress and the Executive Branch
  • Form and manage coalitions
  • Develop communications strategies

She is the Executive Director of Invent Together and a visiting lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. She serves on the board of directors of the American Constitution Society.

Holly served as Policy Director for Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) and Chief Labor and Pensions Counsel for the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee.

She received The American Lawyer, “Dealmaker of the Year” award in 2019. The Hill named her a “Top Lobbyist” from 2013 to the present, and she has been ranked by Chambers USAAmerica’s Leading Business Lawyers from 2012 to the present. One client noted to Chambers: “Holly is an exceptional attorney who excels in government relations and policy discussions. She has an incisive analytical skill set which gives her the capability of understanding extremely complex legal and institutional matters.” According to another client surveyed by Chambers, “Holly is incredibly intelligent, effective and responsive. She also leads the team in a way that brings out everyone’s best work.”

Photo of Morgan Schreurs Morgan Schreurs

Morgan Schreurs helps clients develop and execute public policy strategies, counsels clients through cultural change and political risk, and builds and manages coalitions to accomplish clients’ objectives.

Morgan primarily works with wireless technology, health technology, financial technology, and other companies on public policy…

Morgan Schreurs helps clients develop and execute public policy strategies, counsels clients through cultural change and political risk, and builds and manages coalitions to accomplish clients’ objectives.

Morgan primarily works with wireless technology, health technology, financial technology, and other companies on public policy matters important to highly regulated industries.

Morgan is a skilled legislative drafter with experience drafting bills and amendments on a wide variety of topics introduced and enacted by the U.S. Congress and state legislatures.

Drawing on her experience in Minnesota State government relations, Morgan co-leads the firm’s state policy practice, advising clients on complex multistate legislative and regulatory policy matters and managing state advocacy efforts.

Morgan is on the forefront of DEI and civil rights issues. As the Policy Director of Invent Together—an alliance of universities, nonprofits, companies, and other stakeholders dedicated to broadening participation in inventing and patenting—she has successfully advocated for the enactment of legislation to close the inventor diversity gaps. She serves on Working Group for the Council for Inclusive Innovation led by the Department of Commerce, as well as the Leadership Advisory Committee of the National Women’s Law Center. In addition, Morgan maintains an active pro bono practice focused on matters related to equity and inclusion.

Prior to joining Covington, Morgan worked for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) under former Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA). She also supported federal, state, and local political campaigns and served on the Hillary for America National Advance Team.