Likely the most significant legislation Congress will consider this year is a budget reconciliation bill. For weeks, congressional Republicans and President Trump have been laying the groundwork to agree on a process for advancing Trump’s agenda via the special legislative process of reconciliation, with the original aim to have a
Continue Reading Budget Reconciliation: Process Primer and FY25 Senate Budget Resolution OverviewCongressional Action
Tulsi Gabbard’s Confirmation Hearing for Director of National Intelligence: A Preview of a FISA Section 702 Reauthorization Fight?
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s January 30, 2025, confirmation hearing for former Representative Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, previewed a potentially difficult reauthorization path for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”). While Gabbard appears to now publicly favor reauthorization of Section 702, her…
Continue Reading Tulsi Gabbard’s Confirmation Hearing for Director of National Intelligence: A Preview of a FISA Section 702 Reauthorization Fight?Senator Hawley Introduces Sweeping U.S.-China AI Decoupling Bill
On January 29, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) introduced the Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act (S. 321), one of the first bills of 119th Congress to address escalating U.S. competition with China on artificial intelligence. The new legislation comes just days after Chinese AI company DeepSeek…
Continue Reading Senator Hawley Introduces Sweeping U.S.-China AI Decoupling BillBiden Administration Rulemakings at Risk for Congressional Review Act Cancellation in New Congress
With the 119th Congress now assembled, Republicans control both the House and Senate, and will control the White House starting on January 20th. If history is any guide, this change in party control of the White House, plus unified control of Congress by the president’s party, will pave the way for Republicans to deploy the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn a number of regulations issued by the Biden Administration. When President Trump first took office in 2017, congressional Republicans used the CRA to overturn more than a dozen rules promulgated by the Obama Administration.
The CRA mandates federal agencies to submit all final rules to Congress before the rule takes effect. Then, Congress has 60 days to overturn a rule by enacting a joint resolution of disapproval that withdraws the rule and prohibits the agency from issuing a rule that is “substantially the same.” However, if a rule is submitted to Congress within 60 days before adjournment, the CRA’s “lookback period” allows additional time—a new 60-day period—for the new Congress to review the rule and introduce a resolution of disapproval. If a rule has already taken effect when a CRA resolution is signed into law, the rule “shall be treated as though such rule had never taken effect.” 5 U.S.C. § 801(f).
Although the House and Senate parliamentarians make the official determination of whether a particular rule falls within the lookback period when a disapproval resolution is introduced, the Congressional Research Service estimates that rules submitted to Congress on or after August 1, 2024 are likely subject to possible nullification. The CRA allows members of Congress to introduce resolutions of disapproval starting on the 15th day of the new session. Under the current congressional schedules, Senators may introduce CRA resolutions starting around January 23, 2025, and Representatives may introduce CRA resolutions starting around February 5, 2025.
Many federal agencies operated under an earlier deadline and thus prioritized finalizing and submitting high-priority rules this spring—including those “significant rules” defined in Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094, that are predicted to have an annual impact of $200 million or more on the economy. Because these rules were submitted earlier, they will likely fall outside the CRS’s estimated CRA lookback window. The George Washington University Regulatory Study Center estimates approximately 100 of these significant rules may fall into the CRA window, which is likely fewer than in prior changes in administrations, in part due to early agency action. However, there are more than 1,000 rules that could ultimately be subject to disapproval under the CRA in the new Congress. Continue Reading Biden Administration Rulemakings at Risk for Congressional Review Act Cancellation in New Congress
U.S. AI Policy Expectations in the Trump Administration, GOP Congress, and the States
The results of the 2024 U.S. election are expected to have significant implications for AI legislation and regulation at both the federal and state level.
Like the first Trump Administration, the second Trump Administration is likely to prioritize AI innovation, R&D, national security uses of AI, and U.S. private sector investment and leadership in AI. Although recent AI model testing and reporting requirements established by the Biden Administration may be halted or revoked, efforts to promote private-sector innovation and competition with China are expected to continue. And while antitrust enforcement involving large technology companies may continue in the Trump Administration, more prescriptive AI rulemaking efforts such as those launched by the current leadership of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) are likely to be curtailed substantially.
In the House and Senate, Republican majorities are likely to adopt priorities similar to those of the Trump Administration, with a continued focus on AI-generated deepfakes and prohibitions on the use of AI for government surveillance and content moderation.
At the state level, legislatures in California, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, and others likely will advance AI legislation on issues ranging from algorithmic discrimination to digital replicas and generative AI watermarking.
This post covers the effects of the recent U.S. election on these areas and what to expect as we enter 2025. (Click here for our summary of the 2024 election implications on AI-related industrial policy and competition with China.)
The White House
As stated in the Republican Party’s 2024 platform and by the president-elect on the campaign trail, the incoming Trump Administration plans to revoke President Biden’s October 2023 Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (“2023 AI EO”). The incoming administration also is expected to halt ongoing agency rulemakings related to AI, including a Department of Commerce rulemaking to implement the 2023 AI EO’s dual-use foundation model reporting and red-team testing requirements. President-elect Trump’s intention to re-nominate Russell Vought as Director of the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) suggests that a light-touch approach to AI regulation may be taken across all federal agencies. As OMB Director in the prior Trump Administration, Vought issued a memo directing federal agencies to “avoid regulatory or non-regulatory actions that needlessly hamper AI innovation and growth.”Continue Reading U.S. AI Policy Expectations in the Trump Administration, GOP Congress, and the States
Tech Policy in a Second Trump Administration: AI Promotion and Further Decoupling from China
Technology companies will be in for a bumpy ride in the second Trump Administration. President-elect Trump has promised to adopt policies that will accelerate the United States’ technological decoupling from China. However, he will likely take a more hands-off approach to regulating artificial intelligence and reverse several Biden Administration policies related to AI and other emerging technologies.Continue Reading Tech Policy in a Second Trump Administration: AI Promotion and Further Decoupling from China
Are Recess Appointments Coming Back?
As 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump may be more focused and strategic than he was as the 45th, evidence of which may be a tweet of his from Sunday:
Any Republican Senator seeking the coveted LEADERSHIP position in the United States Senate must agree…
Continue Reading Are Recess Appointments Coming Back?A Primer for Navigating the Presidential Appointee Vetting and Confirmation Process
Following the decisive election on November 5, the process of selecting and vetting individuals to fill the second Trump administration’s key appointed positions is quickly shifting into high gear. For those tapped for consideration, the decision to enter the process may be one of the most significant decisions of their…
Continue Reading A Primer for Navigating the Presidential Appointee Vetting and Confirmation ProcessBills to Regulate Sports Betting Introduced in Senate and House
Updated October 1, 2024. Originally posted September 19, 2024.
Last month, far-reaching proposals to regulate sports betting were introduced in the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives by Senator Richard Blumenthal and Representative Paul Tonko which mark “the first comprehensive legislation that would address the public health implications inherent in the widespread legalization of sports betting.” The bills, called the Supporting Affordability and Fairness with Every Bet (SAFE Bet) Act, would establish a broad federal scheme imposed on State gambling authorities to limit sports betting advertising, address problem gambling, and focus on other “public safety” measures.
The SAFE Bet Act would establish a general nationwide prohibition on sports betting with an exception for States that receive approval from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to operate a sports betting program consistent with the requirements of the proposed legislation. DOJ approval of a State’s application would be valid for three years and would be renewable. To receive approval, a State would have to show that it meets minimum federal standards related to sports betting advertising, controls on customer deposits, general consumer-protection requirements, and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by sports betting operators. The following is a high-level summary of the key standards.
Advertising Limits. The bills’ advertising standards include prohibitions on broadcast advertising between 8 AM and 10 PM (local time) and during live sports events. Also, advertisements could not utilize common promotional mechanisms such as “bonus,” “no sweat,” or similar offers. Advertisements also could not instruct the audience how to gamble or explain how wagers work.Continue Reading Bills to Regulate Sports Betting Introduced in Senate and House
Bills to Regulate Sports Betting Introduced in Senate and House
Over the past few days, far-reaching proposals to regulate sports betting were introduced in the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives by Senator Richard Blumenthal and Representative Paul Tonko which mark “the first comprehensive legislation that would address the public health implications inherent in the widespread legalization of sports…
Continue Reading Bills to Regulate Sports Betting Introduced in Senate and House