In recent years, the business community in China has been abuzz with talk of various market access “negative lists” — lists of exceptions to what would otherwise be open market access. China has now introduced a new market access negative list for all forms of investment in the country, both domestic and foreign. Before describing the implications of this new list, we first note the existing and proposed negative lists that have drawn widespread attention over the past couple of years:

  • US-China BIT Negative List (Under Negotiation). There has been extensive discussion of the negative list for the US-China Bilateral Investment Treaty (“BIT”) currently under negotiation. Foreign investment activities included on the BIT’s negative list would not be eligible for the market access benefits and protections of the BIT — particularly, national treatment (that is, equal treatment with domestic investors), a core principle of standard US bilateral investment treaties with other countries.
  • Nationwide Foreign Investment Negative List (Announced). Among other reforms proposed in the draft Foreign Investment Law that was released in early 2015, Chinese authorities plan to issue a nationwide negative list for foreign investment market access. As with the US-China BIT, unlisted items would be given national treatment (with some procedural differences between the treatment of investments by foreign and domestic investors).
  • Pilot FTZ Foreign Investment Negative List (Issued). Following the issuance of a negative list for foreign investment activities in China’s first pilot free trade zone (“Pilot FTZ”) in Shanghai, Chinese authorities have now adopted one unified negative list that governs all Pilot FTZs established to date — specifically, the Pilot FTZs in Shanghai, Fujian Province, Guangdong Province, and Tianjin. 

In December 2015, the State Council announced its decision to introduce a market access negative list that applies to all investment activities in China, by both domestic and foreign investors. Swiftly acting on the State Council’s decision, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce issued a trial version of the list (“Trial Negative List”) in March to be piloted throughout the entirety of the four provinces and municipalities that currently host Pilot FTZs (not just in the FTZ zones themselves): Shanghai, Tianjin, Fujian Province, and Guangdong Province. The respective governments for these four regions are to propose their own methods for implementing the Trial Negative List and obtain the approval of the State Council. Central government authorities are seeking feedback from the implementation of the Trial Negative List to facilitate the roll-out of a nationwide market access negative list in 2018.

The Trial Negative List includes 96 prohibited items in 17 sectors and 232 restricted items in 22 sectors. These items have been compiled from several sources, and include (1) investment projects requiring administrative approvals as set out in the Consolidated List of Administrative Approval Items by Departments under the State Council (included in the list as restricted items ); (2) project categories designated for elimination or closed for new investment under the Catalogue for Guiding Industry Restructuring (2011 version), which make up 46 of the 96 prohibited items; (3) projects requiring approvals from the relevant development and reform departments under the Catalogue of Investment Projects Subject to Government Verification and Approval (2014 version) (included in the list as restricted items); and (4) projects restricted or prohibited under other national laws, administrative regulations, and State Council decisions. 12 of the 328 total items are (or include sub-items that are) entirely new and were not restricted or prohibited under previous laws and regulations. These new items include an approval requirement for collaborations between domestic media and foreign news agencies and censorship requirements for gaming and entertainment equipment.

Foreign investors, including those without interests in the four pilot regions, should pay close attention to these developments. Those investing in the four regions where the Trial Negative List is being piloted should note that they are to be subject to both the Trial Negative List and any other restrictions on foreign investment that may concurrently exist (whether written restrictions or de facto ones — for instance if no procedural pathway for approval of a particular type of investment in a regulated industry is provided under existing laws and regulations). Consequently, in the four Pilot FTZs, foreign investors will need to heed both the restrictions and prohibitions contained in the Trial Negative List as well as those on the foreign investment negative list for the Pilot FTZs.

In short, the Trial Negative List does not, itself, offer any improvements in market access for foreign investors in China. Rather, it represents an effort on the part of the Chinese government to consolidate in one place a list of all restrictions applicable to both domestic and foreign investors. The goal, hopefully, is to lay the groundwork for procedural reforms, as well as for revisions to the list in the future that would provide improved market access.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Ashwin Kaja Ashwin Kaja

Ashwin Kaja is special counsel in the firm’s Beijing office and is a member of the firm’s International Trade, Public Policy, Data Privacy & Cybersecurity, and Anti-Corruption practice groups. He has advised multinational companies, governments, and other clients on a range of matters…

Ashwin Kaja is special counsel in the firm’s Beijing office and is a member of the firm’s International Trade, Public Policy, Data Privacy & Cybersecurity, and Anti-Corruption practice groups. He has advised multinational companies, governments, and other clients on a range of matters related to international trade, public policy and government affairs, data privacy, foreign investment, anti-corruption compliance and investigations, corporate law, real estate, and the globalization of higher education. He also serves as the China and India editor for Covington’s GlobalPolicyWatch.com. Mr. Kaja is also a certified information privacy professional (CIPP/US). Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Kaja was an associate at another major international law firm in Beijing.

Read more about Ashwin KajaEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Timothy P. Stratford Timothy P. Stratford
Read more about Timothy P. StratfordEmail
Photo of Yan Luo Yan Luo

Yan Luo advises clients on a broad range of regulatory matters in connection with data privacy and cybersecurity, antitrust and competition, as well as international trade laws in the United States, EU, and China.

Yan has significant experience assisting multinational companies navigating the…

Yan Luo advises clients on a broad range of regulatory matters in connection with data privacy and cybersecurity, antitrust and competition, as well as international trade laws in the United States, EU, and China.

Yan has significant experience assisting multinational companies navigating the rapidly-evolving Chinese cybersecurity and data privacy rules. Her work includes high-stakes compliance advice on strategic issues such as data localization and cross border data transfer, as well as data protection advice in the context of strategic transactions. She also advises leading Chinese technology companies on global data governance issues and on compliance matters in major jurisdictions such as the European Union and the United States.

Yan regularly contributes to the development of data privacy and cybersecurity rules and standards in China. She chairs Covington’s membership in two working groups of China’s National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee (“TC260”), and serves as an expert in China’s standard-setting group for Artificial Intelligence and Ethics.

Read more about Yan LuoEmail
Show more Show less