The global biotechnology landscape is evolving at an unprecedented speed, driven by advances in synthetic biology and genome editing, which, coupled with AI, make biotechnology stand at the forefront of innovation.  These developments offer unprecedented opportunities for advancing health and protecting against biological threats, but also make biotechnological misuse faster, cheaper, and more accessible.  For that reason, the European Commission has proposed the introduction of a new Union-level framework on biodefence and the prevention of biotechnology misuse in the European Biotech Act (the “Biotech Act”).

Continue Reading The Proposed EU Biotech Act: New Biosecurity Rules for Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology Companies

On August 25, 2026, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit set aside guidance by the FCC’s Media Bureau stating that two types of political advertising were entitled to the favorable “lowest unit charge” (“LUC”) rate: ads paid for as “party coordinated expenditures,” meaning ads paid for by a party in coordination with a federal candidate, and ads placed by joint fundraising committees involving a federal candidate. This question had become particularly salient after the Supreme Court’s decision in June that struck down limits on party coordinated expenditures, allowing unlimited party spending in coordination with candidates, as we explained here. The Fourth Circuit’s ruling was in response to a challenge to the Media Bureau’s Public Notice by four Democratic candidates for federal office. The ongoing litigation has a direct and immediate impact on broadcasters and political advertisers, but its broader significance may lie in what the Fourth Circuit said about judicial review of bureau-level FCC actions.

Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Sets Aside FCC Media Bureau Guidance on Lowest Unit Charge; FCC Asks the Supreme Court to Step In

As widely reported, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress following his appearance before the Committee in July, where he refused to answer the Committee’s questions by asserting his rights under the Fifth Amendment.  At the same time, the procedure used by Chairman Rand Paul to refer the matter to the Justice Department, which he did without a vote of the full Senate, has raised the consequential procedural question of whether Chairman Paul can skip the Senate floor and advance the congressional contempt matter to DOJ—and potentially a prosecution—without a vote of the full chamber.  That pathway would mark a departure from prior congressional contempt precedents and could lead to a novel fight over an old statute, a fight that the Department of Justice may or may not wish to wage.  Indeed, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal last week, some in the Trump administration are reportedly questioning whether Chairman Paul’s contempt effort is “procedurally sound.”  To understand why this may be the case, one can look to the contempt of Congress statute, its interpretation in relevant cases, and the sequence of events following the Committee’s contempt vote.

Continue Reading The Procedural Puzzle Complicating the Fauci Contempt Referral

Executive Summary

On August 22, 2026, U.S. tariffs of 50 percent imposed under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1338) took effect against a range of imports from Canada, including chemicals, prepared food and beverages, plastics, metal items, machinery, cosmetics, wood and paper products, industrial…

Continue Reading Section 338 Tariffs on Canada Take Effect as Canada Announces Retaliatory Response

Earlier this week, on August 25, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issued a Public Notice seeking public comment on how the agency might increase and improve spectrum access for commercial space launch and reentry activities.  The Public Notice follows through on a directive in the Trump Administration’s National Space Transportation Policy memorandum issued last week. Comments are due Monday, September 14, 2026 and reply comments are due Thursday, September 24, 2026.

Continue Reading FCC Seeks Public Comment on Improving Spectrum Access for Commercial Space Launch and Reentry Operations

On August 19, 2026, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $275,000 settlement with online tax preparation company TaxAct over allegations that the company improperly disclosed taxpayer information to advertising partners through third-party tracking technologies on its website. The Attorney General alleged that, between January 2018 and December 2022, TaxAct used third-party tracking technologies for analytics and marketing purposes and, in doing so, disclosed detailed taxpayer information without informing consumers.

The settlement is notable because it highlights regulatory scrutiny over the disclosure of financial information, and also because it imposes extensive governance, monitoring, and auditing requirements on TaxAct relating to the use of third-party tracking technologies. In addition, the settlement does not specify what law was allegedly violated.

Continue Reading Connecticut Attorney General Settles with TaxAct Over Sharing Taxpayer Data

Introduction

In the space of just one week, the EU’s top court, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”), delivered two important judgments that clarify the scope of sport rule-making activities that can benefit from an antitrust exemption: the ROGON judgment on 9 July 2026, and the much more detailed RRC Sports judgment on 16 July 2026, which builds on and develops ROGON.  The sporting rules at play in these cases concerned football players’ agents, and more specifically those adopted by the German Football Association (ROGON judgment), and FIFA (RRC Sports judgment).  However, the principles set out in the ROGON and RRC Sports judgments will resonate beyond sport arenas to find potential application to rule-making by self-regulatory bodies in other sectors. 

Continue Reading ROGON and RRC Sports: The EU’s Top Court vindicates a pragmatic application of the antitrust sporting exemption to players’ agent regulations

For more than twenty years, FIFA’s Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (“RSTP”) have sought to balance the stability of football teams with player mobility. That balance was fundamentally challenged by the European Court of Justice (“ECJ” or the “Court”) in Case C-650/22 FIFA v Diarra (“Diarra”).

Less than two years later, on 10 June 2026, FIFA approved a new version of the RSTP due to officially enter into force on 1 January 2027.

The reform represents the most comprehensive overhaul of the transfer system since the introduction of the modern RSTP in 2001. While it responds directly to Diarra, it also reflects the ECJ’s insistence – primarily expressed in Superleague – that sports governing bodies must pursue legitimate objectives through rules that are transparent, objective and proportionate. Moreover, alongside the substantive amendments to the RSTP, FIFA introduced a new governance model under which future changes to the RSTP will be developed through structured social dialogue among players, clubs and leagues.

This blog examines the key EU competition law and free movement implications of the new RSTP. In particular, it considers how the revised rules reflect the principles identified in previous ECJ case law and how they reshape the competitive and regulatory framework governing player transfers.

Continue Reading From Diarra to FIFA’s New Player Transfer System: How EU Law is Reshaping Football’s Transfer Rules and Governance

Executive Summary

There were a few key takeaways from the 2026 NATO Summit in Ankara, where Covington was present:

  • Industrial collaboration boost: Introduced a “Front Door for Industry” to streamline engagement and procurement processes.
  • “Made in NATO”: Aims to foster industrial cooperation and ensure nondiscrimination across the Alliance. For non-EU firms, this will help balance the EU’s preference for “made in the EU” production.
  • Strategic industry cooperation: Strategy emphasizing communication, innovation, and scaling defense production, recognizing industry as integral to security alongside armed forces.
  • Division of roles: NATO focuses on command, control, and capability standards, and the EU to manage funding and regulatory frameworks – a complex but opportunity-rich environment.
Continue Reading European Defense After the NATO Summit

This alert discusses hot topics and enforcement trends that have made an impact across the Middle East region in the first half of 2026, and signals developments to watch by the end of the year, with a focus on Compliance (Anti-Bribery and Corruption, Anti-Money Laundering, Sanctions, Data Protection), Foreign Direct…

Continue Reading Middle East Hot Topics 2026 Mid-Year Review