In an increasingly global economy, sophisticated foreign companies are seeking strategic and cost‑effective ways to establish or expand their presence in the United States, enter new product lines, or acquire strategic assets at attractive valuations. One frequently overlooked pathway is acquiring assets through a U.S. bankruptcy case. 

Click here to

Continue Reading Section 363 Sales Provide Strategic Opportunities to Acquire Assets in the U.S.

In introducing the American Security Robotics Act of 2026, Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) have extended a now familiar congressional playbook into a new and consequential domain:  robotics.  The bill would prohibit executive agencies from procuring or operating unmanned ground vehicle systems (UGVs) manufactured or assembled by “covered foreign entities,” a term that targets companies tied to adversarial nations such as China.

The legislation also reflects early signs of bicameral alignment.  Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY-21) has introduced companion legislation in the House, signaling that concerns regarding robotics systems manufactured by certain foreign entities are not confined to a single chamber or party.

At one level, the proposal is straightforward.  At another, it reflects a maturing legislative architecture that has evolved across successive National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) and related statutes—an architecture that is increasingly product-specific, attentive to supply chain risk, and focused on issues of data access, operational control, and systemic vulnerability.

Continue Reading The Next Frontier of Supply Chain Security: Congress Trains Its Sights on Robotics

Artificial intelligence (“AI”) continues to reshape the UK financial services landscape in 2026, with consumers increasingly relying on AI-driven tools for financial guidance and firms deploying more autonomous systems across their businesses.

The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and Bank of England (“BoE”) (together “the Regulators”) have consistently signalled that AI will be overseen through existing regulatory frameworks, rather than through bespoke AI-specific rules. At the same time, political scrutiny is intensifying, supervisory expectations are rising, and the Regulators are investing heavily in sandbox initiatives and long-term reviews to test whether those frameworks remain fit for purpose.

This article explores the latest policy signals, supervisory initiatives and regulatory tools shaping the UK’s evolving approach to AI in financial services.

Continue Reading UK Financial Services Regulators’ Approach to Artificial Intelligence in 2026

On April 1, 2026, the Seventh Circuit in Clay v. Union Pacific Railroad Company held that an amendment to the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), limiting damages to a per-person basis, applies retroactively to cases pending when the amendment was enacted in 2024. This decision limits the potential statutory damages plaintiffs may obtain for pending BIPA cases.

Continue Reading Seventh Circuit Holds that BIPA Amendment Applies Retroactively

On January 8, 2026, Brazil published Law 15,330/2026, officially recognizing açaí berry as a Brazilian national fruit in a bid to protect it from so-called “biopiracy”, i.e., the illegal exploitation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge (“ATK”).  Açaí berry is a ‘superfood’ rich in nutrients which grows almost exclusively along the Amazon River, and particularly in Brazil, its largest producer and exporter, producing about 1.74 million tons of açaí and generating around BRL 7.7 billion in 2024.

The legislative recognition of açaí berry as a national fruit – following the earlier designation of cupuaçu in 2008, which itself responded to attempts to register “cupuaçu” as a trademark in Japan – is largely symbolic in nature.  Law 15,330/2026 does not introduce new substantive rights or regulatory mechanisms, as Brazil already comprehensively governs access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefits arising from their use, under Law 13,123/2015 and through its implementation of the Nagoya Protocol.  Its practical significance therefore lies less in creating additional protection than in drawing renewed political and public attention to the enforcement of Brazil’s existing access and benefit‑sharing regime.

Continue Reading Brazil declares Açaí a National Fruit: What Are the Real Practical Implications for EU Companies?

In 2025, Texas, Nebraska, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma enacted state-level foreign agent registration and disclosure regimes that were loosely modeled on the federal Foreign Agents Registration Act. And in the first few months of 2026, several states — Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Missouri and West Virginia, to name a few — have

Continue Reading State FARA Laws Pose Unique Constitutional Challenges

This update highlights key legislative and regulatory developments in the first quarter of 2026 related to artificial intelligence (“AI”), connected and automated vehicles (“CAVs”), and Internet of Things (“IoT”).

I. Federal AI Legislative Developments

In the first quarter, members of Congress introduced several AI bills related to nonconsensual images, chatbots

Continue Reading U.S. Tech Legislative & Regulatory Update – First Quarter 2026

(“Joint Statement”). The Joint Statement is aimed at services likely to be accessed by children that fall within the scope of the Online Safety Act 2023 (“OSA”) and UK data protection legislation, and is designed to help providers comply with both their online safety and data protection obligations when deploying age assurance.

The Joint Statement arrives alongside a broader push from both regulators—including Ofcom’s recent call to action directed at major tech firms, an open letter from the ICO urging platforms to strengthen their age checks, and several enforcement actions by both regulators.

Continue Reading Ofcom and ICO Issue Joint Statement on Age Assurance