On September 30, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed three laws that will regulate the use of AI in the employment context, starting in the new year. Below, we briefly summarize these developments, which we discuss in greater detail in our prior blog post. These laws join an existing body
Continue Reading New California AI Employment Laws: Key Requirements for EmployersPrivacy
California Enacts Several Minors’ Privacy and Safety Laws
Recently, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a sweeping set of laws related to minors’ privacy and safety, including new laws that restrict covered platforms from providing certain features to users under 16, impose a duty of care on social media platforms, revise the state’s Age-Appropriate Design Code, modify the state’s age-assurance requirements governing age signals, and impose safety requirements on AI chatbots. This blog summarizes the key takeaways from these new laws.
Continue Reading California Enacts Several Minors’ Privacy and Safety LawsCalifornia Legislature Advances AI Employment Bills
At the end of August, the California legislature passed three bills that would regulate the use of AI in the employment context. These bills are now on Governor Newsom’s desk, and he has until September 30 to sign or veto. Below is a summary of the three bills.
SB 947…
Continue Reading California Legislature Advances AI Employment BillsCCPA Cyber Audits: Why Companies Should Prepare Now
California’s new cybersecurity audit requirements under the CCPA are approaching, and companies that collect or process California residents’ personal information should be preparing now. Covington has been helping clients navigate these requirements in real time and has developed practical readiness materials, scoping frameworks, and benchmarking insights that companies can leverage…
Continue Reading CCPA Cyber Audits: Why Companies Should Prepare NowConnecticut Attorney General Settles with TaxAct Over Sharing Taxpayer Data
On August 19, 2026, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $275,000 settlement with online tax preparation company TaxAct over allegations that the company improperly disclosed taxpayer information to advertising partners through third-party tracking technologies on its website. The Attorney General alleged that, between January 2018 and December 2022, TaxAct used third-party tracking technologies for analytics and marketing purposes and, in doing so, disclosed detailed taxpayer information without informing consumers.
The settlement is notable because it highlights regulatory scrutiny over the disclosure of financial information, and also because it imposes extensive governance, monitoring, and auditing requirements on TaxAct relating to the use of third-party tracking technologies. In addition, the settlement does not specify what law was allegedly violated.
Continue Reading Connecticut Attorney General Settles with TaxAct Over Sharing Taxpayer DataADMT Law Roundup: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT Laws
Employers increasingly rely on automated tools to help make decisions concerning hiring, promotion, discipline, and termination. In response, state legislatures and agencies have begun to regulate uses of these technologies, often referred to as automated decision-making technology (“ADMT”). These laws generally require entities that deploy ADMT in the employment context to, among other requirements, notify affected individuals, disclose how ADMT factors into decisions, and provide rights to appeal or request human review.
This remains a fast-moving area and a hot topic for legislative and regulatory focus, with several states enacting laws this year and additional bills pending. Below, we summarize the key legislative and regulatory ADMT developments that apply in the employment context.
Continue Reading ADMT Law Roundup: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT LawsWhite House Releases National Security Presidential Memorandum on Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime
On August 12, 2026, the Administration published a National Security Presidential Memorandum (“NSPM”) (“Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime”) that signals the Administration’s focus on private-sector participation in offensive cyber operations by establishing a federally supervised program to enable private sector participants to conduct offensive cyber operations against “Cyber-Enabled Transnational Criminal Organizations” (“CE-TCOs”).
The NSPM follows Executive Order 14390, which, together with the U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy, demonstrated the U.S. government’s continued focus on disrupting foreign cyber-enabled criminal organizations that engage in fraud, scams, and related cyber-enabled schemes. The NSPM, which states that “it is the policy of the United States to use all instruments of national power, including the innovative capabilities of the private sector, to combat cybercrime,” signals a potential shift in the U.S. government’s approach to offensive cyber operations by non-government actors. At the same time, the NSPM makes clear that any such operations would be conducted only after U.S. government vetting and authorization, under federal coordination and oversight, and consistent with U.S. law. This post summarizes the NSPM and identifies practical takeaways for private-sector entities that may be considering whether to participate in the program. Additional implementation guidance is expected by mid-October 2026 (60 days after the NSPM publication).
Continue Reading White House Releases National Security Presidential Memorandum on Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled CrimeFrench Constitutional Council Strikes Down Under-15 Social Media Ban
On August 14, 2026, the French Constitutional Council (the “Constitutional Council”) struck down Article 1 of France’s Act to protect minors from the risks posed by the use of social media (the “Act”), which would have barred minors under the age of fifteen from accessing online social media services. The Constitutional Council held that the prohibition infringed on the freedom of expression and communication in a manner that was not appropriate, necessary, or proportionate to the objective pursued and, separately, that the legislature failed to provide the legal safeguards required to protect the right to respect for private life in connection with the age verification process that the ban would, by necessity, have entailed.
We summarise key aspects of the decision below.
Continue Reading French Constitutional Council Strikes Down Under-15 Social Media BanIllinois Expands Genetic Privacy Law to Biomarkers
The Illinois Governor recently signed SB 2886, which expands the scope of the state’s Genetic Information Privacy Act (“GIPA”) to include “biomarker testing” and “biomarker.” GIPA currently regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of genetic testing information.
The bill defines “biomarker” as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and…
Continue Reading Illinois Expands Genetic Privacy Law to BiomarkersNew York Publishes Final SAFE For Kids Act Rules
On July 28, 2026, the New York Office of the Attorney General released final rules (the “Rules”) implementing the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act, which goes into effect on January 25, 2027.
The SAFE for Kids Act requires online “addictive social media platforms,” which are defined as websites, online services, and applications that offer an “addictive feed” as a significant portion of their services, to restrict providing an “addictive feed” and nighttime notifications for minor users unless they obtain verifiable parental consent.
Continue Reading New York Publishes Final SAFE For Kids Act Rules