Photo of Bryan Ramirez

Bryan Ramirez

Bryan Ramirez is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office and is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises clients on a range of regulatory and compliance issues, including compliance with state privacy laws. Bryan also maintains an active pro bono practice.

On September 30, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed three laws that will regulate the use of AI in the employment context, starting in the new year. Below, we briefly summarize these developments, which we discuss in greater detail in our prior blog post. These laws join an existing body…

Continue Reading New California AI Employment Laws: Key Requirements for Employers

At the end of August, the California legislature passed three bills that would regulate the use of AI in the employment context. These bills are now on Governor Newsom’s desk, and he has until September 30 to sign or veto. Below is a summary of the three bills.

SB 947…

Continue Reading California Legislature Advances AI Employment Bills

Employers increasingly rely on automated tools to help make decisions concerning hiring, promotion, discipline, and termination. In response, state legislatures and agencies have begun to regulate uses of these technologies, often referred to as automated decision-making technology (“ADMT”). These laws generally require entities that deploy ADMT in the employment context to, among other requirements, notify affected individuals, disclose how ADMT factors into decisions, and provide rights to appeal or request human review.

This remains a fast-moving area and a hot topic for legislative and regulatory focus, with several states enacting laws this year and additional bills pending. Below, we summarize the key legislative and regulatory ADMT developments that apply in the employment context.

Continue Reading ADMT Law Roundup: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT Laws

On August 12, 2026, the Administration published a National Security Presidential Memorandum (“NSPM”) (“Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime”) that signals the Administration’s focus on private-sector participation in offensive cyber operations by establishing a federally supervised program to enable private sector participants to conduct offensive cyber operations against “Cyber-Enabled Transnational Criminal Organizations” (“CE-TCOs”).  

The NSPM follows Executive Order 14390, which, together with the U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy, demonstrated the U.S. government’s continued focus on disrupting foreign cyber-enabled criminal organizations that engage in fraud, scams, and related cyber-enabled schemes.  The NSPM, which states that “it is the policy of the United States to use all instruments of national power, including the innovative capabilities of the private sector, to combat cybercrime,” signals a potential shift in the U.S. government’s approach to offensive cyber operations by non-government actors.  At the same time, the NSPM makes clear that any such operations would be conducted only after U.S. government vetting and authorization, under federal coordination and oversight, and consistent with U.S. law.   This post summarizes the NSPM and identifies practical takeaways for private-sector entities that may be considering whether to participate in the program.  Additional implementation guidance is expected by mid-October 2026 (60 days after the NSPM publication).

Continue Reading White House Releases National Security Presidential Memorandum on Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime

On July 1, 2026, a California legislative committee advanced amendments to SB 690 that would eliminate private suits asserting website-based “pen register” claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), leaving enforcement exclusively to the California Attorney General.  The amendments come amid a surge of lawsuits and demand letters challenging the use of website technologies under the pen register provision, which the committee described as a “poster child for abusive lawsuits.”  According to the committee analysis, “[b]ecause the potential liability can be staggering,” businesses often settle quickly, thereby “encouraging vexatious litigants to continue blasting out demand letters.”

Continue Reading California Legislature Advances Bill Targeting Wave of CIPA Pen Register Lawsuits

Last month, the Illinois Department of Human Rights (“IDHR”) released draft regulations addressing employers’ use of AI in employment decisions and invited public comment. The IDHR will hold a hearing on the draft regulations on June 10, and the public comment period will close on June 29.

Continue Reading Illinois Department of Human Rights Seeks Public Comment on Draft AI Employment Regulations

On May 27, 2026, the Connecticut governor signed SB 4, an omnibus privacy law, which among other things, amends the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CTDPA”), establishes a data broker registry and accessible deletion mechanism, imposes restrictions on the use of price setting devices and surveillance pricing, and creates requirements for direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies.

Continue Reading Connecticut Enacts Omnibus Privacy Law

Earlier this month, the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in collaboration with the National Security Agency and other international partners, released guidance for organizations on adopting agentic artificial intelligence systems (i.e., systems composed of one or more agents that fundamentally rely on an AI model, such as an LLM, to interpret and reason about the state of the world and can autonomously make decisions and take actions). The guidance highlights the primary security risks and challenges linked to agentic AI and offers practical guidance for safely designing, implementing, and managing these systems.

Continue Reading CISA Releases Guidance on the Careful Adoption of Agentic AI Services

On April 1, 2026, the Seventh Circuit in Clay v. Union Pacific Railroad Company held that an amendment to the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), limiting damages to a per-person basis, applies retroactively to cases pending when the amendment was enacted in 2024. This decision limits the potential statutory damages plaintiffs may obtain for pending BIPA cases.

Continue Reading Seventh Circuit Holds that BIPA Amendment Applies Retroactively