California’s new cybersecurity audit requirements under the CCPA are approaching, and companies that collect or process California residents’ personal information should be preparing now. Covington has been helping clients navigate these requirements in real time and has developed practical readiness materials, scoping frameworks, and benchmarking insights that companies can leverage
Continue Reading CCPA Cyber Audits: Why Companies Should Prepare Now
Libbie Canter
Libbie Canter represents a wide variety of multinational companies on managing privacy, cyber security, and artificial intelligence risks, including helping clients with their most complex privacy challenges and the development of governance frameworks and processes to comply with U.S. and global privacy laws. She routinely supports clients on their efforts to launch new products and services involving emerging technologies, and she has assisted dozens of clients with their efforts to prepare for and comply with federal and state laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Colorado AI Act, and other state laws. As part of her practice, she also regularly represents clients in strategic transactions involving personal data, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence risk and represents clients in enforcement and litigation postures.
Libbie represents clients across industries, but she also has deep expertise in advising clients in highly-regulated sectors, including financial services and digital health companies. She counsels these companies — and their technology and advertising partners — on how to address legacy regulatory issues and the cutting edge issues that have emerged with industry innovations and data collaborations.
Chambers USA 2026 ranks Libbie in Band 2 Nationwide for both Privacy & Data Security: Privacy and Privacy & Data Security: Healthcare.Chambers USA notes, Libbie is "incredibly sharp and really thorough. She can do the nitty-gritty, in-the-weeds legal work incredibly well but she also can think of a bigger-picture business context and help to think through practical solutions."
ADMT Law Roundup: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT Laws
Employers increasingly rely on automated tools to help make decisions concerning hiring, promotion, discipline, and termination. In response, state legislatures and agencies have begun to regulate uses of these technologies, often referred to as automated decision-making technology (“ADMT”). These laws generally require entities that deploy ADMT in the employment context to, among other requirements, notify affected individuals, disclose how ADMT factors into decisions, and provide rights to appeal or request human review.
This remains a fast-moving area and a hot topic for legislative and regulatory focus, with several states enacting laws this year and additional bills pending. Below, we summarize the key legislative and regulatory ADMT developments that apply in the employment context.
Continue Reading ADMT Law Roundup: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT LawsIllinois Expands Genetic Privacy Law to Biomarkers
The Illinois Governor recently signed SB 2886, which expands the scope of the state’s Genetic Information Privacy Act (“GIPA”) to include “biomarker testing” and “biomarker.” GIPA currently regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of genetic testing information.
The bill defines “biomarker” as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and…
Continue Reading Illinois Expands Genetic Privacy Law to BiomarkersCalifornia Legislature Advances Bill Targeting Wave of CIPA Pen Register Lawsuits
On July 1, 2026, a California legislative committee advanced amendments to SB 690 that would eliminate private suits asserting website-based “pen register” claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), leaving enforcement exclusively to the California Attorney General. The amendments come amid a surge of lawsuits and demand letters challenging the use of website technologies under the pen register provision, which the committee described as a “poster child for abusive lawsuits.” According to the committee analysis, “[b]ecause the potential liability can be staggering,” businesses often settle quickly, thereby “encouraging vexatious litigants to continue blasting out demand letters.”
Continue Reading California Legislature Advances Bill Targeting Wave of CIPA Pen Register LawsuitsDelaware General Assembly Passes HB 380, an Amendment to the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act
On June 16, 2026, the Delaware General Assembly passed HB 380, which would amend the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (DPDPA). The bill is currently awaiting the Delaware governor’s signature, and if signed, the amendments would take effect on January 1, 2027. The amendment would impose the following:
Continue Reading Delaware General Assembly Passes HB 380, an Amendment to the Delaware Personal Data Privacy ActRhode Island Enacts Genetic Privacy Law
In what continues to be a busy year for genetic privacy developments, Rhode Island has joined the growing number of states regulating direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) genetic testing with its recently enacted genetic privacy law, S 2203. With S 2203, Rhode Island is the fifth state to enact genetic privacy legislation this year, following Utah, South Dakota, Connecticut, and Vermont.
Continue Reading Rhode Island Enacts Genetic Privacy LawVermont Enacts Privacy Legislation to Regulate Health-Related Information
Vermont recently enacted two privacy bills to regulate health-related information. These include H.639, a genetic privacy bill regulating direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies, and the Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (S.71), a comprehensive privacy law that extends heightened protections to “consumer health data.” You can read our full analysis of S.71 here.
Continue Reading Vermont Enacts Privacy Legislation to Regulate Health-Related InformationSeventh Circuit Holds that BIPA Amendment Applies Retroactively
On April 1, 2026, the Seventh Circuit in Clay v. Union Pacific Railroad Company held that an amendment to the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), limiting damages to a per-person basis, applies retroactively to cases pending when the amendment was enacted in 2024. This decision limits the potential statutory damages plaintiffs may obtain for pending BIPA cases.
Continue Reading Seventh Circuit Holds that BIPA Amendment Applies RetroactivelyUtah and South Dakota Enact Genetic Privacy Laws as Other States Advance Bills
At the state level, genetic privacy remains a fast-moving topic, and states continue to introduce and advance bills regulating genetic data.
Continue Reading Utah and South Dakota Enact Genetic Privacy Laws as Other States Advance BillsConnecticut Attorney General Releases 2025 CTDPA Enforcement Report
The Connecticut Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) issued an updated Enforcement Report (“Enforcement Report”) under the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CTDPA”). The Enforcement Report discusses the OAG’s enforcement actions in 2025 and suggests some areas of focus from the regulator, summarized below.
Continue Reading Connecticut Attorney General Releases 2025 CTDPA Enforcement Report