Skip to content

In connection with this announcement, the OCC also stated it will not object to OCC-regulated banks opting not to prepare for the provisions of the final rule that have a compliance date of January 1, 2023, or January 1, 2024.  Additionally, the agency will not implement or rely on the evaluation criteria in the final rule relating to (i) quantification of qualifying activities, (ii) assessment areas, (iii) general performance standards, (iv) data collection, (v) recordkeeping, and (vi) reporting.

Moreover, the OCC announced that it does not intend to finalize the December 4, 2020 notice of proposed rulemaking requesting comment on the evaluation measure benchmarks, retail lending distribution test thresholds, and community development minimums under the final rule’s general performance standards.  The OCC also discontinued its December 15, 2020 notice and request for comment seeking bank-specific CRA data, which the OCC would have used to determine these metrics under the final rule.

The OCC will continue to implement the provisions that had a compliance date of October 1, 2020.  For example, the agency will continue to publish lists of distressed and underserved areas based on the final rule definitions and provide bank type determinations based on the final rule’s asset thresholds.  In addition, the agency will accept requests for confirmation of activities qualifying for CRA credit under the final rule.

The OCC’s determination to reconsider the final rule comes as Michael Hsu steps in as Acting Comptroller of the Currency (see our blog post on this appointment).  In his opening statement before a House Committee on Financial Services hearing on May 19, 2021, Acting Comptroller Hsu identified three specific concerns with the final rule:  (i) circumstances have changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the agencies should consider amending CRA regulations in light of the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on vulnerable groups; (ii) the public has provided valuable feedback in response to the Federal Reserve’s September 2020 advance notice of proposed rulemaking on CRA reform (which we summarized in a client alert); and (iii) the OCC has learned lessons through its partial implementation of the final rule.

Based on the outcome of the OCC’s review, Acting Comptroller Hsu stated that “all options are under consideration” – including rescinding or revising the final rule, and working with the other banking agencies on a joint CRA reform proposal.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Randy Benjenk Randy Benjenk

Randy Benjenk is co-chair of Covington’s Financial Services Group and advises domestic and foreign banks, fintech companies, other financial services firms, and trade associations on bank regulatory, compliance, transactional, supervisory, enforcement, and public policy matters. Clients turn to Randy for strategic advice and…

Randy Benjenk is co-chair of Covington’s Financial Services Group and advises domestic and foreign banks, fintech companies, other financial services firms, and trade associations on bank regulatory, compliance, transactional, supervisory, enforcement, and public policy matters. Clients turn to Randy for strategic advice and advocacy on their most complex issues involving federal and state banking regulators.

Chambers USA has recognized Randy for his bank regulatory practice, noting that he has received “widespread praise” from clients. Clients describe him as “an outstanding bank regulatory lawyer” and say that “the quality of his legal work and his writing abilities were incredible” and that “he’s very easy to work with, knowledgeable and efficient.”

Randy regularly represents clients in a wide range of financial services regulatory settings, including:

Bank Activities and Prudential Regulation. Advising on novel bank activities, organizational structure, licensing, chartering, governance, capital, liquidity, and prudential regulatory matters, including issues of first impression before federal and state banking agencies.
Corporate Transactions. Advising on mergers and acquisitions, spinoffs, charter conversions, debt and equity issuances, strategic investments, partnerships, de novo bank formations, bank-fintech partnerships, and related regulatory applications, approvals, and disclosures.
Private Equity Investments. Advising on private equity investments in banks, bank investments in private funds, and fund structuring issues under the Volcker Rule, Bank Holding Company Act, and related banking laws and regulations.
Supervisory and Enforcement Matters. Representing clients in examination, supervisory, and enforcement matters involving safety and soundness issues, Community Reinvestment Act obligations, legal compliance, governance, and risk management requirements.
Sustainability and Debanking Laws. Helping financial institutions and industry groups navigate the expanding landscape of federal and state laws and investigations involving environmental, social, governance, reputational risk, fair access, and debanking-related policies.
Crisis Response. Helping clients navigate extraordinary events and market disruptions, including bank failures, pandemic-related governmental responses, liquidity events, and other firm-specific or industry-wide regulatory challenges.
Public Policy and Regulatory Advocacy. Advocating for changes to policies affecting the financial services industry, including in the context of U.S. banking legislation, federal banking agency rulemakings, state policy initiatives, and international regulatory standards.