On May 12, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients” and an accompanying “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Announces Actions to Put American Patients First by Lowering Drug Prices and Stopping Foreign Free-riding on American Pharmaceutical Innovation.” The May 12 Executive Order is the latest action by the Trump Administration related to prescription drug pricing in the United States, following an Executive Order issued on April 15, 2025 (as discussed in a prior client alert). Today’s Executive Order criticizes the disparity between prices paid for drug products in foreign markets and the “enormously high prices” for the same drug products in the United States. To “end global freeloading” and “inflated prices in the United States [that] fuel global innovation,” the Executive Order calls for most-favored-nation (“MFN”) pricing in the United States.

The Executive Order explicitly calls for the Secretary of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative to take “all necessary and appropriate action” to ensure foreign countries do not engage in acts, policies, or practices that may be unreasonable or discriminatory; impair national security; or have the effect of shifting a disproportionate share of the cost of global pharmaceutical research and development onto American patients, including by “suppressing the price of pharmaceutical products below fair market value in foreign countries.” The Executive Order also mandates that the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) facilitate direct-to-consumer purchasing programs for manufacturers that sell products to American patients at the MFN price.

Within 30 days of the date of the Executive Order, the HHS Secretary, in coordination with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, the Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), and other relevant executive department and agency officials, must communicate MFN price targets to pharmaceutical manufacturers. If manufacturers do not make “significant progress” towards MFN pricing for American patients, then the Executive Order directs the following actions:

  • The HHS Secretary shall propose a rulemaking plan to impose MFN;
  • The HHS Secretary shall “consider” certification to Congress that implementation of Section 804(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act will pose no additional risk to public health and safety, and result in a significant reduction in the cost of prescription drugs for American patients; and, if such certification is made, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs shall take action under Section 804(j)(2)(B) to describe circumstances under which the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) will consistently grant waivers for individuals’ drug importation from developed nations with low-cost prescription drugs;
  • The Attorney General and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission shall consider enforcement against anticompetitive practices by manufacturers following the report issued under the April 15 Executive Order (as described in this client alert);
  • The Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads shall review and consider necessary action regarding the export of drugs or precursor material that may be fueling “global price discrimination”;
  • The Commissioner of Food and Drugs shall review and potentially modify or revoke drug approvals for drugs that may be unsafe, ineffective, or improperly marketed; and
  • The Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, with agency heads, shall take “all action available” to address “global freeloading and price discrimination.”

Notably, Section 804(j) enables the authorization of importation of prescription drugs and devices by individuals “for personal use” “under such conditions as the HHS Secretary determines to be appropriate,” and Section 804(j)(2)(B) requires FDA to publish guidance. This contrasts with other provisions of Section 804, which enable commercial importation from Canada.

The approach in today’s Executive Order echoes a similar MFN-related Executive Order issued by President Trump during his first Administration. As explained in this client alert, the first Trump Administration initially announced an Executive Order titled “Lowering Drug Prices by Putting America First” (commonly referred to as the MFN Executive Order) on July 24, 2020. However, President Trump withheld the July 24, 2020 Executive Order pending negotiations with industry on potential alternatives until he issued a new version of the MFN Executive Order on September 13, 2020. The September 13, 2020 Executive Order directed the HHS Secretary to “develop and implement a rulemaking plan” for payment models under the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (“CMMI”) regarding Medicare Part B and Part D. The prior Administration ultimately issued a CMMI model called the “Most Favored Nation Model,” which was enjoined by courts and rescinded by the Biden Administration.

Given prior actions by the first Trump Administration and their similarity to the May 12 Executive Order, including a directive to the HHS Secretary to consider rulemaking pathways for MFN pricing, it is feasible that more actions may be forthcoming from the Trump Administration regarding MFN pricing. There also may be further actions from the Commerce Department and the Office of the United States Trade Representative on trade-related issues.

Our team continues to monitor MFN pricing and related activity.

If you have any questions concerning the material discussed in this client alert, please contact the members of our Health Care practice.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kristie Gurley Kristie Gurley

Kristie Gurley advises life sciences clients on complex pricing, reimbursement, and market access issues. Kristie brings unique insight from her recent experience serving in the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where she supported…

Kristie Gurley advises life sciences clients on complex pricing, reimbursement, and market access issues. Kristie brings unique insight from her recent experience serving in the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where she supported the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on drug pricing issues, including implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In this role, Kristie served as a lead attorney on the IRA Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, including with respect to policy development, operations, and the first cycle of negotiations. She also supported the Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program and additional IRA implementation efforts, Medicaid Drug Rebate Program rulemaking and agency determinations, and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation’s development and launch of a model for cell and gene therapies.

Kristie’s practice involves strategic, policy, and regulatory advice supporting market access for drug and biological products. Kristie provides advice related to federal health care program coverage and reimbursement, Medicaid price reporting, agency engagement, payer contracting and formulary access, value-based contracting, and other issues under federal and state drug pricing regimes. In addition to regulatory counseling, Kristie advises on strategic commercial transactions, litigation opportunities, compliance and enforcement risk, and policy advocacy.

Photo of Anna D. Kraus Anna D. Kraus

Anna Durand Kraus advises on issues relating to the complex array of laws governing the health care industry. Her background as Deputy General Counsel to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) gives her broad experience with, and valuable insight into…

Anna Durand Kraus advises on issues relating to the complex array of laws governing the health care industry. Her background as Deputy General Counsel to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) gives her broad experience with, and valuable insight into, the programs and issues within the purview of HHS, including Medicare, Medicaid, fraud and abuse, and HIPAA privacy and security. Anna is co-chair of the firm’s Health Care Industry practice group.

Anna regularly advises clients on Medicare reimbursement matters, particularly those arising under Part B and the Part D prescription drug benefit. She also has extensive experience with the Medicaid Drug Rebate program. She assists numerous pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, health care providers, pharmacy benefit managers, and other health care industry stakeholders to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by the Affordable Care Act.

Anna is a trusted adviser on health information privacy, security and breach notification issues, including those arising under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act. Her background in this area dates back to the issuance of the original HIPAA privacy regulations.

Anna’s clients depend on her to guide them through compliance with the Anti-Kickback statute, the Stark regulations, and other laws preventing fraud and abuse in the health care industry. Her deep knowledge of these laws has made her an important component of the firm’s representation of pharmaceutical companies and health care organizations under federal investigation or facing allegations under the False Claims Act. In addition, clients contemplating acquisitions in the health care sector rely on her to guide due diligence efforts.

Photo of Ryan Quillian Ryan Quillian

Ryan Quillian, former Deputy Assistant Director of the Technology Enforcement Division at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), advises clients on the full range of civil antitrust issues, including conduct and merger investigations, civil litigation, and counseling and compliance.

Ryan joined Covington after…

Ryan Quillian, former Deputy Assistant Director of the Technology Enforcement Division at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), advises clients on the full range of civil antitrust issues, including conduct and merger investigations, civil litigation, and counseling and compliance.

Ryan joined Covington after eight years of public service with the FTC, where he worked on antitrust investigations in a variety of industries, including technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences, retail, distribution, consumer goods, and healthcare. In addition to his investigation experience, Ryan also developed strong relationships with staff throughout the agency, routinely interacted with agency leadership, communicated directly with foreign competition agencies, and provided technical assistance on proposed legislation.

As a manager of the FTC’s Technology Enforcement Division, Ryan supervised complex investigations into potentially anticompetitive mergers and conduct involving technology companies. Prior to joining the Technology Enforcement Division, Ryan served as Counsel to the Director of the Bureau of Competition, Attorney Advisor to Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips, Acting Deputy Assistant Director of the Mergers IV Division, and a staff attorney in the Mergers IV Division.

Drawing on his substantive antitrust experience in government and private practice, Ryan provides clients with strategic counseling to manage competition risks. He regularly advises clients on issues such as antitrust compliance, business conduct, internal investigations, and responding to Second Requests as necessary. Ryan has extensive experience helping clients assess and comply with their premerger notification obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act and comparable foreign premerger regimes, and he regularly guides clients through the coordination of merger clearances in jurisdictions around the world.

Photo of Michael Labson Michael Labson

Mike Labson has been a trusted advisor to pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients for over 25 years. He draws on his wide range of regulatory expertise to provide strategic and compliance advice, and address FDA and other health care law issues in litigation, investigations…

Mike Labson has been a trusted advisor to pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients for over 25 years. He draws on his wide range of regulatory expertise to provide strategic and compliance advice, and address FDA and other health care law issues in litigation, investigations, and transactions.

Mike is the managing partner of the Boston office and co-chairs the firm’s global Life Sciences practice. He previously served in a number of firm leadership positions, including as a member of the firm’s Management Committee and Executive Committee and as co-chair of the Diversity Committee.

Mike provides creative and practical solutions to biopharmaceutical clients large and small across critical regulatory areas. He actively advises on:

Clinical trial programs, including study subject recruitment, informed consent, good clinical practice conduct issues, and expanded access.
Regulatory approval strategies, including FDA expedited approval programs, FDA advisory committee preparation, and drug/device and drug/diagnostic approvals.
FDA dispute resolution.
Orphan drug, pediatric, and Hatch-Waxman exclusivity, and generic drug and biosimilar product approval standards.
Product promotion, payer, and scientific exchange communications.
Company post-approval activities, including REMS, pharmacovigilance, required post-marketing studies, and NDA and BLA changes.
Rx-to-OTC drug switches and OTC drug claims.
DEA requirements for controlled substances.

Mike’s pro bono work focuses on criminal justice matters. He is on the Board of the Children’s Law Center and previously served as the Vice Chair of the Children’s Dental Health Project. Mike has also been an Adjunct Professor of Law at the American University Washington College of Law, and is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation.

Mike is Band 1 in Chambers Global and Chambers USA for Pharmaceutical/Medical Products Regulatory and Life Sciences Regulatory/Compliance. He is also recognized in The Best Lawyers in America, Washington DC Super Lawyers, and LMG Life Sciences, where he was the Life Sciences Attorney of the Year in 2016.

As one reviewer in Chambers stated, Mike is “a terrific regulatory lawyer and a good business counselor, who can explain things in ways that regular people can understand.”

Photo of Marney Cheek Marney Cheek

Marney Cheek has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts, including the International Court of Justice and major…

Marney Cheek has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts, including the International Court of Justice and major arbitral institutions such as the AAA, ICSID, PCA, and SIAC. She represents clients in complex international business disputes, having successfully defended a client in a $1.8 billion claim filed by a collaboration partner. Ms. Cheek serves as both counsel and arbitrator in numerous investment treaty arbitrations. She is an expert on public international law and currently represents the Government of Ukraine in its landmark cases before the International Court of Justice adverse to the Russian Federation, including Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). In addition to leading complex investment treaty and international commercial disputes under the rules of major arbitral institutions, Marney routinely advises clients on public international law matters and issues arising under numerous multilateral treaties. She also is at the forefront of business and human rights disputes, having represented global labor unions in the first binding arbitration brought under a business and human rights compact, the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety.

Drawing upon her experience as Associate General Counsel at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Marney routinely counsels clients on international trade matters and is a member of the roster of arbitrators for several U.S. free trade agreements. Her pro bono work includes representation of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, among other matters.

Marney is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as a Vice President of the American Society of International Law. She has previously taught investment law at Columbia University School of Law. She is recognized as an “extraordinarily thoughtful” and “creative” lawyer with a “wealth of knowledge” on international law matters in Chambers and Legal 500.

Photo of Beth Braiterman Beth Braiterman

Beth Braiterman is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Food, Drug, and Device and Health Care Practice Groups. She advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and food companies on a variety of regulatory and compliance…

Beth Braiterman is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Food, Drug, and Device and Health Care Practice Groups. She advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and food companies on a variety of regulatory and compliance issues.

Photo of A.J. Carvalho A.J. Carvalho

A.J. Carvalho advises medical device, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and laboratory companies on FDA regulatory and compliance issues. He has assisted clients on myriad matters, including in complying with FDA regulations, responding to FDA enforcement actions and Congressional inquiries, conducting due diligence of FDA-regulated companies…

A.J. Carvalho advises medical device, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and laboratory companies on FDA regulatory and compliance issues. He has assisted clients on myriad matters, including in complying with FDA regulations, responding to FDA enforcement actions and Congressional inquiries, conducting due diligence of FDA-regulated companies, and resolving issues that arise during product development.

Prior to joining the Food, Drug, and Device practice group, A.J. was a member of the Patent Litigation and White Collar Defense and Investigation Practice Groups. As a member of the Patent Litigation Practice Group, A.J. focused on representing pioneer pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in Hatch-Waxman patent litigation. As a member of the White Collar Defense and Investigations Practice Group, A.J. focused on helping medical device, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology companies navigate civil and criminal investigations by the Department of Justice and FDA.

Prior to joining Covington, A.J. was a clinical research coordinator at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center focused on exploratory clinical research related to blast injuries (including amputations), advanced prosthetics (including myoelectric prosthetic control), and other concomitant conditions. His research and work has been published in numerous scientific peer-reviewed journals.

Photo of Aubrey Stoddard Aubrey Stoddard

Aubrey Stoddard is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Aubrey advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device clients on a broad range of policy and regulatory issues.

Aubrey also maintains an…

Aubrey Stoddard is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Aubrey advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device clients on a broad range of policy and regulatory issues.

Aubrey also maintains an active pro bono practice centered on reproductive health.