On February 20, 2025, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced that it is seeking public comments on any unfair trade practices and non-reciprocal trade arrangements implemented by foreign trading partners. The comment period is currently open and the deadline for submitting comments is March 11, 2025.

According to the Federal Register notice, comments can be submitted through a portal accessible at https://comments.ustr.gov/s/, under docket number USTR-2025-0001. USTR will accept comments from any interested party, including businesses, individuals, and trade associations, among others. Interested parties are able to include business confidential information in their submissions, which will not appear in the public version of their comments.

USTR’s announcement also stated that the public comment process is not the only opportunity to provide information to the agency on these issues, and that USTR “welcomes ongoing engagement with and information from any interested party.”

This comment period offers a new opportunity for U.S. exporters to seek the Administration’s  potential support in eliminating foreign market access barriers. If you are interested in submitting comments to USTR as part of this process, Covington can assist in the preparation and transmission of these comments. We would also be happy to assist in crafting a broader strategy for engaging USTR and other relevant agencies on these or other trade-related issues.

Background

USTR’s launch of this public comment process follows the issuance of the “America First Trade Policy” memorandum by President Trump on his first day in office, which directed USTR to lead a review of unfair foreign trade practices and to recommend appropriate remedies. USTR also linked the comment process to President Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade and Tariffs” memorandum issued on February 13, which directed USTR and the Commerce Department to investigate “the harm to the United States from any non-reciprocal trade arrangements adopted by any trading partners” and to recommend actions in response. Covington’s alert on this memorandum is available here.

Scope of Requested Comments

USTR has invited comments on a country-by-country basis (or also on an economy-wide basis in the case of the European Union) regarding (i) “any unfair trade practice by a foreign country or economy”; or (ii) “any non-reciprocal trade arrangements.” USTR has defined unfair trade practices broadly, to include “policies, measures, or barriers that undermine or harm U.S. production, or exports, or a failure by a country to take action to address a non-market policy or practice in a way which harms the United States.” USTR has also requested that comments quantify the harm caused by such practices—ideally with a corresponding dollar amount—and to explain the underlying methodology used to calculate that figure.

USTR also noted that—while it is concerned about the practices by all trading partners—it is particularly interested in the practices of the largest trading economies (such as the G20 countries), and those countries and economies with which the United States has the largest trade deficits in goods. USTR specifically identifies as countries of interest Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union (to include individual member states), India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Türkiye, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam—which collectively cover 88 percent of total goods trade with the United States.

Future Tariffs or Other Trade Actions

USTR’s notice emphasizes that, even though it is inviting the public to submit comments regarding unfair trade practices and non-reciprocal arrangements through March 11, it might still take action in furtherance of the America First Trade Policy memorandum or the Reciprocal Trade and Tariffs memorandum in advance of these submissions, and that other investigations USTR has been directed to complete under the America First Trade Policy memorandum—including reviews regarding the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, other free trade agreements, and China’s compliance with the “Phase One” Agreement—will proceed in parallel.

If you have any questions concerning the material discussed in this client alert, please contact the members of our Trade Policy practice.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Shara Aranoff Shara Aranoff

Shara helps clients navigate trade remedies, tariffs, and customs regulations in support of their U.S. and global market strategies.

Shara is the Chair of Covington’s International Trade Practice Group, and co-leads the Customs practice.

Drawing on her 20 years of service in the…

Shara helps clients navigate trade remedies, tariffs, and customs regulations in support of their U.S. and global market strategies.

Shara is the Chair of Covington’s International Trade Practice Group, and co-leads the Customs practice.

Drawing on her 20 years of service in the U.S. government, she develops legal and public policy strategies to assist clients engaging with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Congress, and the courts. In high-stakes antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, Shara helps global manufacturers, distributors, and retailers protect their access to the U.S. market. She assists technology, life sciences and manufacturing companies enforce and defend their intellectual property rights in cross-border Section 337 investigations. Chambers praises her for bringing “behind-the-curtain knowledge to the private sector” in proceedings before the ITC by leveraging her experience as a decision maker.

Shara also regularly advises clients in a wide range of industries on Customs compliance and tariff mitigation, including:

Providing legal opinions or seeking Customs rulings on classification, valuation, country of origin, and product marking/labelling.
Conducting internal compliance reviews, drafting compliance policies, and providing training.
Responding to CBP audits and inquiries and filing voluntary disclosures.
Developing strategies to reduce tariffs and take advantage of trusted trader programs.

Prior to joining the firm, Shara was a Commissioner and Chairman of the ITC, where she was a decision-maker in hundreds of Section 337, antidumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard investigations.

She previously served as Senior International Trade Counsel for Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) at the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, where she was responsible for legislative and policy issues including Trade Promotion Authority; negotiations involving the World Trade Organization and free trade agreements; and trade remedy and customs laws. She was also an attorney-advisor in the Office of the General Counsel at the ITC, where she was lead counsel in litigation before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Court of International Trade.

Read more about Shara AranoffEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Marney Cheek Marney Cheek

Marney Cheek has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts, including the International Court of Justice and major…

Marney Cheek has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts, including the International Court of Justice and major arbitral institutions such as the AAA, ICSID, PCA, and SIAC. She represents clients in complex international business disputes, having successfully defended a client in a $1.8 billion claim filed by a collaboration partner. Ms. Cheek serves as both counsel and arbitrator in numerous investment treaty arbitrations. She is an expert on public international law and currently represents the Government of Ukraine in its landmark cases before the International Court of Justice adverse to the Russian Federation, including Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). In addition to leading complex investment treaty and international commercial disputes under the rules of major arbitral institutions, Marney routinely advises clients on public international law matters and issues arising under numerous multilateral treaties. She also is at the forefront of business and human rights disputes, having represented global labor unions in the first binding arbitration brought under a business and human rights compact, the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety.

Drawing upon her experience as Associate General Counsel at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Marney routinely counsels clients on international trade matters and is a member of the roster of arbitrators for several U.S. free trade agreements. Her pro bono work includes representation of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, among other matters.

Marney is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as a Vice President of the American Society of International Law. She has previously taught investment law at Columbia University School of Law. She is recognized as an “extraordinarily thoughtful” and “creative” lawyer with a “wealth of knowledge” on international law matters in Chambers and Legal 500.

Read more about Marney CheekEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jay Smith Jay Smith

Jay Smith is a partner in the Washington office. He joined the firm after several years as a professor of political science and international affairs, during which he specialized in international trade policy and international dispute settlement. His practice in the International and…

Jay Smith is a partner in the Washington office. He joined the firm after several years as a professor of political science and international affairs, during which he specialized in international trade policy and international dispute settlement. His practice in the International and Litigation groups draws on this academic and policy experience.

He is currently helping clients develop and implement strategies to mitigate supply chain risks arising from U.S. trade actions. In addition, Jay regularly represents respondents in U.S. trade remedy proceedings and related litigation, helping to secure a number of negative injury determinations at the ITC in recent years. Jay also advises clients on the negotiation and enforcement of international treaty commitments under the WTO, bilateral and regional trade agreements such as the USMCA, and other international fora. Much of his policy work is at the intersection of trade and other areas, such as intellectual property, the environment, or labor rights.

Read more about Jay SmithEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Kate McNulty Kate McNulty

Kate McNulty is a senior associate in the Washington office who helps clients navigate complex international trade and investment matters. She counsels companies, trade associations, and governments on U.S. trade and tariff measures, as well as implementation of responsive measures by foreign governments.

Kate McNulty is a senior associate in the Washington office who helps clients navigate complex international trade and investment matters. She counsels companies, trade associations, and governments on U.S. trade and tariff measures, as well as implementation of responsive measures by foreign governments. She provides legal and strategic advice to clients on global policy issues and geopolitical risks, including assessing and mitigating reputational, economic, or physical risk to their businesses or investments. She advises clients on the application and use of international treaties—including free trade agreements (FTAs), bilateral investment treaties (BITs), and agreements under World Trade Organization (WTO) framework—to open markets and resolve disputes, also advising clients seeking to understand and engage with the negotiation and implementation of such agreements.

Kate also focuses her trade practice on U.S. anti-forced labor laws as well as business-related human rights matters, advising clients on the application and enforcement of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and Withhold Release Orders (WROs) issued by the U.S. government. She helps clients develop and implement strategies to mitigate supply chain risks, including by building compliance programs, developing due diligence procedures, and conducting risk assessments. She also advises clients on conducting human rights-related investigations and implementing related findings.

Kate has represented corporate clients in both commercial and investment treaty arbitrations, including under ICSID, ICC, UNCITRAL, and ICDR rules, and also represents clients in proceedings before U.S. administrative bodies and U.S. courts, including in trade remedy proceedings (AD/CVD).

She also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on international human rights and public international law. She has represented U.S.-funded media outlet Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty to secure the release of one of its journalists in a prisoner exchange with Russia. Her work also includes representation of the Clooney Foundation for Justice, the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights, and the Public International Law & Policy Group.

Read more about Kate McNultyEmail
Show more Show less