On April 7, 2026, the Fair Work Agency (“FWA”) was established as a new single enforcement body for employment rights in the UK, operating under the framework set out in Part 5 of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA”). In this alert, we provide an overview of the FWA and its civil and criminal investigation and enforcement powers and some practical considerations for employers.

What is the FWA?

As an executive agency of the Department for Business and Trade (DBT), the FWA consolidates a range of labour market enforcement functions previously exercised by separate bodies, including:

  • Enforcement of employment agency standards, formerly carried out by the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate (EASI);
  • Gangmaster licensing requirements and protections against serious labour exploitation, formerly overseen by the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA); and
  • Enforcement of pay‑related rights, including the national minimum wage (“NMW”) and national living wage, which will transfer to the FWA from His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in April 2027.

Enforcement powers

For employers, the establishment of the FWA reflects a shift from a predominantly complaint‑driven enforcement model towards more proactive regulatory oversight of labour standards in relation to the legislation in scope of the FWA’s remit (i.e. “relevant labour market legislation” listed in Part 1 of Schedule 7 of the ERA).

The FWA has broad supervisory and investigatory powers, including the ability to proactively initiate investigations into suspected breaches of relevant labour market legislation. In particular:

  • Search powers: FWA enforcement officers may enter premises (subject to obtaining the necessary warrants) and compel the production of specified information and documents.
  • Notices of Underpayment: The FWA may issue notices of underpayment where an employer has failed to pay sums due under specified statutory pay provisions (including, in due course, NMW, statutory sick pay, and holiday pay), requiring payment of the outstanding amount within 28 days. A notice can capture: (i) “underpayments” (sums owed to each underpaid individual), going back up to six years from the date the notice is issued; and (ii) penalties of 200% of the amount specified in the notice (subject to a minimum of £100 and a maximum of £20,000 per individual). A single notice may cover multiple workers. As such, where underpayments affect multiple workers across a workforce, employers could be faced with significant financial exposure from combined arrears and penalties.
  • Criminal enforcement: Where there is evidence of a criminal labour market offence (i.e. an offence under the relevant in-scope labour market legislation), the FWA may use “labour market enforcement undertakings” (“LME Undertakings”) and “labour market enforcement orders” (“LME Orders”). An LME Undertaking is a voluntary agreement between the FWA and a person or business that the FWA believes to have committed a criminal labour market offence, setting out the steps that must be taken to prevent further offending and protect workers. Where appropriate, an LME Undertaking may remain in force for up to two years. Where a person or business does not agree to enter into an undertaking within the statutory period, or where the undertaking is breached, the FWA may apply to court for an LME Order. An LME Order may remain in force for up to two years and may be varied or discharged by the court on application.
  • Costs: Secondary regulations may require a person who has failed to comply with any relevant labour market legislation to pay a charge relating to the enforcement costs incurred by the FWA. The amount may be a fixed sum or calculated by reference to an hourly rate. These cost provisions must be introduced by secondary legislation, and it is not clear when these will be introduced or how robustly costs will be enforced, but this provision at least theoretically represents a potential to shift the cost of enforcement directly onto non-compliant employers.

Employment rights

The FWA will have oversight over a wide range of employment rights, including monitoring compliance with holiday pay and statutory sick pay rules. For example, the FWA will ensure that all employers keep records to demonstrate compliance with holiday entitlement and holiday pay for six years from the date the records were made (failure to do this is a new criminal offence under the ERA, punishable by a fine).

Significantly, the FWA will have the ability to bring civil proceedings on behalf of workers in the Employment Tribunal. In reality, it is expected that this power will only be used where a large number of people have been impacted or there is a strategic aspect to such litigation. The FWA will also be able to provide legal assistance, including legal advice and representation, to employees (and potentially employers and trade unions) wishing to bring employment claims and to recover the costs of doing so. This assistance will not extend to offering facilities to settle a dispute (e.g., mediation). It remains to be seen how the role of the FWA here will interact with the current roles of ACAS.

Modern slavery offences

The FWA is also now responsible for enforcing provisions of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (“MSA”) relating to offences of slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour, as well as associated prevention and risk orders. The FWA can investigate modern slavery across all industry sectors in England and Wales. In exercising these functions, the FWA will operate within a multi‑agency framework, working alongside the police, the National Crime Agency and other law enforcement bodies, and has defined statutory investigatory and enforcement powers for criminal investigations into relevant MSA offences within its remit. Note that there is the potential for further regulation in relation to modern slavery/forced labour (about which see our recent post here). Though it is not yet clear where that regulatory landscape is headed, if there is further regulation, it is possible the FWA could also be a key regulator in that context.

Effectiveness in practice

While the agency consolidates a broad enforcement remit, the extent to which the FWA drives a sustained change in labour market enforcement will depend on its operational capacity and resourcing over time. It is not yet clear how the FWA will be funded or how it will navigate the 2026–2027 “transitional year”, which the Government frames in its policy paper as a period of “enhanced business as usual”. During this period, the FWA is expected to maintain at least the level of operational performance delivered by its predecessor bodies and to meet the same performance metrics previously applied across EASI, GLAA and HMRC’s National Minimum Wage functions.

Practical implications for companies

As the FWA becomes fully operational, organisations can begin to prepare for potential interactions with the agency by:

  • Reviewing labour standards practices (e.g. compliance with existing employment rights, such as national minimum wage, holiday pay and agency worker rights) to inform assessment of potential risks.
  • Ensuring that all statutory pay provisions are correctly calculated and applied, given that the FWA’s notice of underpayment regime can capture underpayments going back up to six years from the date a notice is issued.
  • Maintaining accurate and comprehensive labour-related records.
  • Developing a response plan to handle interactions with the FWA, including inspections and information requests.
  • Monitoring forthcoming guidance from the FWA, including on the exercise of its new power to bring Employment Tribunal proceedings on behalf of workers.

You can read more about further changes under the Employment Rights Act here and our UK Business and Human Rights landscape: 2026 Outlook here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Chris Bracebridge Chris Bracebridge

Chris Bracebridge specialises in advising multinational employers on international employment and global mobility matters, including complex transactional issues and senior employee retention and termination arrangements. He co-heads a Global Workforce Solutions team providing the employment, benefits, tax and immigration advice required in these…

Chris Bracebridge specialises in advising multinational employers on international employment and global mobility matters, including complex transactional issues and senior employee retention and termination arrangements. He co-heads a Global Workforce Solutions team providing the employment, benefits, tax and immigration advice required in these complex situations. A keen advocate for increasing the diversity of the legal profession, Chris also leads the London office’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.

Chris’ UK domestic practice comprises contentious, commercial and advisory employment experience. He advises on the HR aspects of company and business acquisitions and disposals, and outsourcing transactions, represents major employers in dismissal, discrimination, and whistle-blowing cases, and advises corporate clients on the full range of day-to-day employment issues (in particular, listed company executive departures), as well as data privacy and pensions matters.

Covington’s Employment team was shortlisted for three UK national awards in 2014/2015. Mr. Bracebridge was shortlisted for Assistant Solicitor of the Year 2009 by The Lawyer magazine. He has gained valuable in-house experience whilst on secondment to two global financial institutions – a major U.S. investment bank and a leading UK bank.

Chris regularly trains and presents to clients and external organizations and writes articles for both the legal press and client publications. He has spoken at events and conferences in the UK, U.S., and Europe on a range of issues such as global mobility, executive departures, redundancy, gender pay gap reporting, data protection and transfers of undertakings.

Photo of Antonio Michaelides Antonio Michaelides

Antonio Michaelides advises clients in heavily regulated sectors on a broad range of cross-border regulatory and compliance matters, with a particular focus on Europe and the Middle East. He has particular expertise in helping clients navigate international HR-legal compliance issues—including labor laws, international…

Antonio Michaelides advises clients in heavily regulated sectors on a broad range of cross-border regulatory and compliance matters, with a particular focus on Europe and the Middle East. He has particular expertise in helping clients navigate international HR-legal compliance issues—including labor laws, international equity compliance and immigration matters—and frequently helps multinationals find solutions to their most complex global employment and benefits challenges.

Antonio is a member of our Global Workforce Solutions team, which brings together various practice areas to provide the employment, employee benefits, tax, immigration and other advice required in these complex situations, and advises clients across a range of industries on both larger strategic projects arising out of company restructures and global mobility arrangements, and day-to-day HR-legal matters.

Antonio has extensive experience with government affairs and regulatory matters in the Middle East—advising government entities, as well as private companies, on a variety of regulatory infrastructure and compliance issues. He previously advised free zone authorities in the Emirate of Dubai on employment and immigration matters, including amendments to the DIFC Employment Law and the application of the DMCC Employment Regulations, and is currently advising on the development of legal and regulatory infrastructure for a number of government-led projects in Saudi Arabia.

Given his EU law expertise, particularly in the areas of free movement of people and establishment, Antonio is a member of the firm’s Brexit Taskforce which is advising a range of clients on the impact and implications of Brexit.

Clients appreciate his responsiveness and business-focused advice, and benefit from his cultural awareness and extensive language skills in the context of managing international projects.

In addition, Antonio has presented, and provided training, to clients and external organizations on the challenges of international assignment management and other common global mobility issues.

Photo of Hannah Edmonds-Camara Hannah Edmonds-Camara

Hannah is a founding member of the firm’s Business and Human Rights (BHR) practice and advises on a breadth of BHR and ESG issues. In particular, Hannah has deep experience advising on the development and implementation of global human rights and environmental due…

Hannah is a founding member of the firm’s Business and Human Rights (BHR) practice and advises on a breadth of BHR and ESG issues. In particular, Hannah has deep experience advising on the development and implementation of global human rights and environmental due diligence programmes, in response to the evolving, global regulatory landscape.

She advises on: compliance with ESG disclosure and due diligence requirements, including the EU’s CSRD and CSDDD; BHR-related investigations and remediation strategies; responding to complaints raised through non-judicial grievance mechanisms (including OECD National Contact Points); ESG due diligence in an M&A context; global risk assessments; workplace culture reviews; design of project and issue-specific human rights frameworks and stakeholder engagement strategies; and policy engagement on BHR legislative files.

Photo of Salena Mann Salena Mann

Salena Mann is an associate in the Employment and Employment Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Groups in the London office. Salena advises clients on contentious workplace matters, international employment considerations in corporate transactions, and multi-jurisdictional compliance with employment regulations.

Salena has supported global…

Salena Mann is an associate in the Employment and Employment Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Groups in the London office. Salena advises clients on contentious workplace matters, international employment considerations in corporate transactions, and multi-jurisdictional compliance with employment regulations.

Salena has supported global organisations in designing their internal policies and rethinking their approach to engaging key individuals within their organizations. She also has experience advising on employment matters involving data privacy considerations.

Salena is committed to pro bono work and has provided immigration law advice to several families seeking leave to remain in the UK.

Photo of Emma Sawatzky Emma Sawatzky

Emma Sawatzky advises clients on a range of human rights and sustainability issues and supports them in evaluating and addressing potential legal, operational, and reputational risks across geographies and sectors.

As a member of Covington’s Business and Human Rights and Sustainability Practice Groups…

Emma Sawatzky advises clients on a range of human rights and sustainability issues and supports them in evaluating and addressing potential legal, operational, and reputational risks across geographies and sectors.

As a member of Covington’s Business and Human Rights and Sustainability Practice Groups, Emma advises clients on the rapidly evolving legal and enforcement landscape. Emma has experience with preparing clients for modern slavery and sustainability reporting; conducting gap assessments and developing action plans for sophisticated compliance programs; formulating human rights policies; conducting BHR-related investigations and implementing remediation strategies; advising on human rights-related OECD proceedings; developing responsible sourcing frameworks (including risk assessments, traceability exercises, and supplier engagement strategies); and advising on the potential human rights impacts of downstream product and service use. Emma also assists clients with white collar investigations.

Photo of Richard Rowlands Richard Rowlands

Richard is an associate in the Employment and Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Groups. He advises clients on complex/litigious HR-issues, global employment aspects of mergers & acquisitions and increasing cross-border regulatory employment law compliance for multinational companies, among other things.

Richard has…

Richard is an associate in the Employment and Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Groups. He advises clients on complex/litigious HR-issues, global employment aspects of mergers & acquisitions and increasing cross-border regulatory employment law compliance for multinational companies, among other things.

Richard has assisted some of the world’s largest companies with overhauling their methods for engaging institutional and individual consultants, as well as designing key internal policies. Having spent six months on secondment at a large pharmaceutical client, Richard understands and is well equipped to deal with the problems that clients in highly regulated industries face.

Richard is committed to pro bono work. He has worked on a wide variety of matters, including those relating to charity, environmental and immigration law.

Richard is a co-founder and co-lead of the firm’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Book Club.

Photo of Pimara Soongswang Pimara Soongswang

Pimmy Soongswang is an associate in the Business and Human Rights (BHR) and Sustainability practice groups. She advises clients on their human rights obligations under international standards and supports them in navigating the evolving legal frameworks surrounding responsible business conduct.

Pimmy works across…

Pimmy Soongswang is an associate in the Business and Human Rights (BHR) and Sustainability practice groups. She advises clients on their human rights obligations under international standards and supports them in navigating the evolving legal frameworks surrounding responsible business conduct.

Pimmy works across a range of BHR-related matters, including global supply chain due diligence, modern slavery reporting, forced labour-related import bans, human rights policy development, and OECD proceedings involving human rights issues. Her practice also includes assessing downstream human rights risks associated with AI and other digital products within the context of developing human rights due diligence frameworks.

Pimmy is engaged in pro bono work focused on the rights of women and underrepresented communities. In addition to her client work, she contributes to the firm’s diversity and inclusion efforts