Photo of Jeannie Perron

Jeannie Perron

Jeannie Perron is a member of the firm’s Food and Drug Practice Group, resident in the Washington, DC Office.

In addition to being an attorney, Jeannie also holds a degree in veterinary medicine and has practiced as a veterinarian.  She specializes in food and drug law, with a sub-specialty in animal food and drug law.  In this capacity, she represents companies that manufacture feed, feed ingredients, drugs, biologics and medical devices for animals, as well as clients in related industries.

Her specialties also include advising clients and providing representation on matters before the United States Department of Agriculture arising under the Animal Welfare Act.  Her clients are animal research companies, pharmaceutical companies, and animal dealers and exhibitors.

Another specialized area of practice relates to the importation of animal-derived ingredients and products.  Jeannie advises clients on USDA regulations and procedures in this area and assists clients in securing the required permits and certifications.

In addition to these other practice areas, Jeannie also advises clients in the regulation of dietary supplements, over-the-counter drugs, cosmetics for humans, and import and export of products regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration as well as those having animal or microbially-derived ingredients regulated by USDA. 

On October 31, 2025, the Ninth Circuit struck down certain parts of USDA’s National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, including the exemption for highly refined foods in which modified genetic material is undetectable. The decision remands the invalidated portions of the regulations to USDA for revision and could result in a

Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Invalidates USDA’s Exemption for Highly Refined Foods Under the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard

On November 6, U.S. Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS), a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee and MAHA Caucus, introduced the highly anticipated “Better Food Disclosure Act” (the “Better FDA Act”). The bill aims to close the so-called “GRAS loophole.” Although the bill, which was developed

Continue Reading Senator Marshall Proposes an Overhaul of the GRAS Framework

On September 9, President Trump’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission, chaired by HHS Secretary Kennedy, released its “Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy Report” (Strategy Report) as directed by Executive Order 14212 (EO), which established the MAHA Commission. A draft of this report was leaked to the public about

Continue Reading The Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy Report: What it Says and Doesn’t Say about U.S. Food Regulation

The current Congressional session has seen the introduction of bipartisan legislation that, if enacted, would dramatically change the regulatory landscape for pet food and animal feed products. The reintroduced Pet Food Uniform Regulatory Reform Act (PURR Act) would make sweeping changes to the regulatory framework for dog and cat food

Continue Reading Recent Developments in Pet Food and Animal Feed Law & Regulation

Earlier today, FDA issued a proposed rule that would extend the compliance date of the Food Traceability Rule by 30 months, i.e., until July 20, 2028. The Food Traceability Rule, which is one of the core rules FDA was required to issue under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

Continue Reading FDA Proposes Extension to Food Traceability Rule Compliance Date

On July 25, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a joint Request for Information (RFI) seeking “data and information to help develop a uniform definition of ultra-processed foods (UPF or UPFs) for

Continue Reading U.S. Food Agencies Issue Joint Request for Information on Ultra-Processed Foods

On July 17, 2025, Senators Ed Markey (D-MA) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) introduced the “Ensuring Safe and Toxic-Free Foods Act of 2025.” If enacted, this bill would fundamentally reshape FDA’s generally recognized as safe (GRAS) framework by, among other things, requiring that companies submit GRAS notifications for all ingredients currently

Continue Reading Senators Introduce Bill that would Fundamentally Reshape FDA’s GRAS Framework

Over the last week or so there have been several developments from the Trump Administration and Congress affecting the food industry. We outline several of those developments below and identify key ways industry stakeholders can engage.

Click here to read the full alert on cov.com.

Continue Reading In Case You Missed It: Recent Food-Related Developments from the Trump Administration and Congress

Yesterday, Texas governor Greg Abbott signed into law S.B. 25, which requires food products containing any of 40+ specified ingredients to bear a warning label. This follows Texas’s enactment of S.B. 314 in late May, which prohibits Texas school districts and open-enrollment charter schools from providing free or reduced-price meals that contain any of 17+ specified ingredients. As of the date of this writing, Louisiana S.B. 14, which would impose (1) disclosure requirements for any food product sold in the state that contains specified ingredients, and (2) a ban on the use of certain ingredients in school meals, is sitting on the governor’s desk. It will become law if he signs it or takes no action by June 25. These actions are part of a larger trend of increased scrutiny of food and color additives, as we previously reported and which is a significant feature of the Make America Healthy Again (“MAHA”) Commission’s Assessment released on May 22, 2025.

Texas S.B. 25

S.B. 25 requires human food products containing any of 40+ specified ingredients to bear the following warning label: “WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.” Violators may be subject to a fine not to exceed $50,000 per day for each distinct food product in violation of the requirement.

The ingredients subject to the warning label requirement are the FD&C colors (i.e., Blue Dye No. 1, Red Dye No. 40, etc.) and numerous other ingredients including bleached flour, bromated flour, azodicarbonamide, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), potassium bromate, and propylparaben. Although the sweeteners aspartame, sucralose, acesulfame potassium (as well as high fructose corn syrup) were listed in earlier drafts of the bill, they are not included in the bill ultimately signed into law. 

The warning requirement will apply only to food product labels “developed or copyrighted on or after January 1, 2027.” Thus, it appears that food labels in use or even just copyrighted before that date could continue to be used for extended periods of time beyond that date.Continue Reading Texas Also Enacts Bans on Certain Ingredients in School Meals; Similar Louisiana Bill Progresses

On March 24, 2025 Governor Patrick Morrisey of West Virginia signed into law H.B. 2354 which will impose a ban on the use of specified food additives, including seven food dyes, in food, drink, confectionery, or condiment products in the state. In passing this law, West Virginia became the first state

Continue Reading West Virginia Passes Law Prohibiting the Use of Seven Food Dye Ingredients