Life Sciences & Digital Health

I. Background – From Pharma-Dialogue to Compulsory Price Cuts

Tomorrow, on 29 April 2026, the German Government is expected to adopt a new law to stabilize the finances of the statutory health insurances. This draft law titled “GKV-Beitragssatzstabilisierungsgesetz” (GKV-BStabG) proposes manifold cost-containment measures that would also significantly impact pharmaceutical companies. As such, the new law inter alia proposes new (tightened) pricing rules and compulsory markdown payment obligations for drug companies.

The GKV-BStabG proposes a mix of spending cuts and revenue-increasing measures projected to save the German healthcare system almost €20 billion in 2027 and more than €42 billion by 2030. The cuts in pharmaceutical spending are expected to contribute around €1.9 billion savings in 2027.

The scope of the proposed cost containment measures appears to have hit the German pharmaceutical industry a bit off-guard. Over the last months, the German Government had initiated a Pharma & MedTech Dialogue (see our earlier blog on this dialogue) that gave hope that the Government was open to listen to the industry needs. While the GKV-BStabG is not final and will likely evolve during the legislation process, it clearly shows the Government’s primary interest in short-term cost-cuttings.

This article outlines the key proposals in the GKV-BStabG affecting the pharmaceutical industry and provides an overview of the roadmap of the legislation process. The proposed reform in Germany may also interfere with other international trends like the Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) pricing developments in the US.

Continue Reading Germany plans significant cuts in drug pricing and reimbursement – How would the GKV-Beitragssatzstabilisierungsgesetz impact pharmaceutical companies?

On January 8, 2026, Brazil published Law 15,330/2026, officially recognizing açaí berry as a Brazilian national fruit in a bid to protect it from so-called “biopiracy”, i.e., the illegal exploitation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge (“ATK”).  Açaí berry is a ‘superfood’ rich in nutrients which grows almost exclusively along the Amazon River, and particularly in Brazil, its largest producer and exporter, producing about 1.74 million tons of açaí and generating around BRL 7.7 billion in 2024.

The legislative recognition of açaí berry as a national fruit – following the earlier designation of cupuaçu in 2008, which itself responded to attempts to register “cupuaçu” as a trademark in Japan – is largely symbolic in nature.  Law 15,330/2026 does not introduce new substantive rights or regulatory mechanisms, as Brazil already comprehensively governs access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefits arising from their use, under Law 13,123/2015 and through its implementation of the Nagoya Protocol.  Its practical significance therefore lies less in creating additional protection than in drawing renewed political and public attention to the enforcement of Brazil’s existing access and benefit‑sharing regime.

Continue Reading Brazil declares Açaí a National Fruit: What Are the Real Practical Implications for EU Companies?

Introduction

As discussed in our previous blogpost (link), on 16 December 2025, the European Commission (“Commission”) released its Proposal for the European Biotech Act (“Biotech Act”) (see here). 

This blogpost focuses on Chapter II of the Proposal (“Union Health Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing”), which introduces a framework for the recognition of “health biotechnology strategic projects” (“Strategic Projects”) and “high impact health biotechnology strategic projects” (“High Impact Strategic Projects”), together with a package of regulatory and support measures aimed at accelerating their development and deployment in the Union.

Continue Reading The Biotech Act Recognises and Supports “Strategic Projects” And “High Impact Strategic Projects” to Reinforce the Union Biotechnology Sector

Germany has kicked off a new Pharma and MedTech Dialogue that aims to develop new policies and regulatory reform proposals to re‑establish Germany as a competitive, innovation‑friendly location for life sciences R&D and manufacturing. The outcome of this dialogue shall be the basis for a new German Pharma and MedTech Strategy.

Continue Reading German Government launches new Pharma & MedTech Dialogue – Broad agenda, big hopes but unclear prospects

On November 5, 2025, the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge (“MITECO”) adopted a Resolution setting out the National Plan for the control of compliance with access and benefit-sharing (“ABS”) obligations under Regulation 511/2014 implementing the Nagoya Protocol in the European Union.  The National Plan sets out a “risk-based” control system to ensure that life sciences companies in, e.g., the pharmaceutical, plant breeding, cosmetic and other sectors operating in Spain utilize genetic resources (“GRs”) and associated traditional knowledge (“ATK”) in compliance with ABS rules of the country where the GRs and ATK are accessed. We provide more details below.

Building on the existing ABS framework in Spain, and in particular on the Royal Decree 124/2017, the MITECO adopted a National Plan setting out a “risk-based” control system, mandating the competent authorities of the Autonomous Communities (“the authorities”) to perform controls on users of certain sectors that are more likely at risk of utilizing GRs and ATK in violation of ABS rules.  

Continue Reading ABS Enforcement Expected in Spain: Spain Adopted a National Plan to Enforce Access and Benefit-Sharing Rules

On November 12, 2025, UNESCO’S General Conference adopted its Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology (“the Recommendation”)–the first attempt at establishing a global legal framework for the ethical development and use of neurotechnology. The Recommendation aims to set out a comprehensive rights-based framework for the entire life cycle of neurotechnology, from the design of neurotechnology products and services to their disposal.

While not legally-binding, the Recommendation states that its provisions should be considered by, among others, UNESCO Member States, research organizations, and private companies involved in neurotechnology, and that they establish how best to honor fundamental human rights in the development, deployment and disposal of this technology. It is therefore possible that in the future, they may be a starting point for binding legislation, or could be used as persuasive authority to support enforcement actions arising under existing legislation protecting fundamental human rights, e.g., the GDPR and other privacy laws around the world. In that regard, it is notable that the EU AI Act was inspired, at least in part, on UNESCO’s November 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. There is, therefore, a real possibility that private sector companies developing neurotechnologies will be subject to rules specifically regulating such technologies in the future.

Continue Reading UNESCO Adopts First Global Framework on Neurotechnology Ethics

This is one in a series of Inside EU Life Sciences blogs on the European Commission’s (“Commission’s”) latest proposal for a European Biotech Act.

On 16 December 2025, the Commission announced a proposal to introduce a new draft Regulation (“Proposed Regulation”) aimed at boosting the EU’s competitiveness in the biotech…

Continue Reading European Biotech Act: Potential new extension for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for ATMPs and biotechnology medicines

In a landmark judgement, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne has set new standards for pharmaceutical advertising with influencers. First, a key point from the decision is that the court qualifies paid influencers as agents of the drug company with respective consequences for the company (discussed below). Second, the court treats promotional social media reels/videos like TV ads which leads to subsequent disclosure obligations. Third, influencers can regularly qualify as “known persons” so that the restrictions under German law for drug advertising with known/famous persons can apply. Continue reading for more details on the case and its implications for pharmaceutical companies.

Continue Reading Influencer Marketing – German court sets new Guardrails for Pharmaceutical Advertising on Social Media

At just after 5 am on 11 December 2025, the EU Parliament and the Council reached agreement on a new directive and a new regulation that will result in a major update to the EU’s pharmaceutical laws.  Progress towards these new rules began in 2016 and are the result of…

Continue Reading EU Announces Political Agreement on Pharma Law Review

On 1 December 2025, the UK Government announced a “landmark” UK-US pharmaceutical deal.   Under the deal, the UK claims to be (so far) the only country to secure zero-percent tariffs on pharmaceuticals exported to the US for the next three years.  In return, the UK has committed to increase its spending on medicines and revise some of the most controversial aspects of the UK pricing and reimbursement system.

Although details as to the implementation of the deal are still unclear, it is clear this will involve major changes to the landscape for commercializing innovator drugs in the UK, after months of attritional and sometimes fractious wrangling between the industry and UK Government.

Continue Reading Landmark UK-US Pharmaceutical Deal