- On September 25, 2025, President Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-7, Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. The memorandum
Peter Koski
Drawing on his experience as a senior DOJ official and leading international anti-corruption practitioner, Peter Koski represents companies and individuals in sensitive, high-stakes government and regulatory enforcement matters and internal investigations.
Peter has a depth of experience investigating, bringing to trial, and handling on appeal complex white collar matters involving the public and private sectors. He has handled an array of matters relating to foreign and domestic corruption, business and human rights, supply chain sourcing, cyber security, and violations of the federal laws governing elected and appointed officials. He has particular experience defending clients against alleged violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), and the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), as well as conspiracy, honest services fraud, bribery, gratuities, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and conflicts of interest.
Prior to joining the firm, Peter served as Deputy Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, where he helped manage a team of over 30 attorneys responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption across the country. In this capacity, he also argued complex constitutional issues before the federal courts of appeal. In over a decade of service in the Justice Department, Peter partnered with numerous U.S. Attorney’s Offices and worked closely with senior officials at over 25 federal agencies. Peter has tried over two dozen bench and jury trials, appeared in court in over a dozen districts across the country, and has handled corruption matters on five continents.
While in the U.S. Government and at Covington, Peter has worked closely with multilateral organizations, such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). His previous experience with the OECD included serving as the U.S. representative on the Anti-Corruption Network Law Enforcement Advisory Board and the Advisory Group for the Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia Thematic Review on Criminalization of Corruption.
Relying on this experience, Peter works with clients to develop effective due diligence programs related to sourcing and supply chains. He also analyzes the impact of regulator activity in this space, and develops strategies for engaging directly with regulators and NGOs. In this capacity, he helps companies assess the impact of Withhold Release Orders and counsels clients on the statutory regimes related to human rights and global supply chain issues.
DOJ White Collar Enforcement Six Months into the Trump Administration
Now that the Trump Administration has cleared the six-month mark, its approach to white collar enforcement is starting to come into focus through multiple policy announcements and an emerging track record. After a flurry of policy announcements from Attorney General Pam Bondi in the early weeks of the new administration…
Continue Reading DOJ White Collar Enforcement Six Months into the Trump AdministrationGratuity or Gift? The Supreme Court May Soon Delineate the Difference
Federal circuit courts are split on a core question of corruption law: whether state and local officials, and agents of organizations that contract with or receive benefits from the federal government, may lawfully accept gratuities.
It is generally a federal crime for state and local officials to act in their…
Continue Reading Gratuity or Gift? The Supreme Court May Soon Delineate the DifferenceRecent Arkansas Sentencing Highlights How Easily Federal Prosecutors Can Target State Campaign Finance Issues
What happens in Arkansas does not stay in Arkansas. Or at least not when federal prosecutors from the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section get involved.
A recent sentencing from Arkansas highlights the many options in DOJ’s toolkit to pursue “state-level” misconduct involving public officials. In the case of former state senator Jeremy Hutchinson, DOJ obtained a “global” guilty plea for misconduct charged in three separate district courts. The court sentenced Hutchinson to 46 months incarceration.
According to the Government’s sentencing memorandum, Hutchinson accepted over $157,500 from the owner of an orthodontic clinic in exchange for advancing favorable legislation to deregulate the state dental industry. The bribes masqueraded as payment for legal retainers, according to the Plea Agreement. In addition, Hutchinson:
commingled campaign contributions and donations with his own personal funds and misappropriated and converted campaign funds for his own personal use, including, but not limited to, using campaign funds for a vacation, hotel stay, travel expenses, groceries, a gym membership, and jewelry.
Considering the Broader Implications of Cruz v. FEC
Late last week, the Supreme Court indicated that it intends to review a challenge by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) to federal limits on the use of post-election contributions to repay pre-election loans that candidates make to their own campaigns. This follows an earlier three-judge district court decision that struck down…
Continue Reading Considering the Broader Implications of Cruz v. FEC
Increased Enforcement Risk for Criminal Campaign Finance Violations
…
Continue Reading Increased Enforcement Risk for Criminal Campaign Finance Violations
Analysis of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020
On June 8, 2020, the House of Representatives introduced the Justice in Policing Act of 2020 (hereinafter “the Act” or “the bill”) to “hold law enforcement accountable for misconduct in court, improve transparency through data collection, and reform police training and policies.” We anticipate a House committee markup the week…
Continue Reading Analysis of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020