As interest rates rise and the threat of a recession looms, many employers are beginning to struggle with balancing the cost of maintaining their workforce with an expected decrease in profits. The frequent result of such a balancing act is a mass layoff. While a reduction in workforce may be
Continue Reading Avoiding Layoffs In an Uncertain Economy![Photo of Carolyn Rashby](https://covingtonburlingblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/userphoto/920-1726271065.jpg)
Carolyn Rashby
Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.
As a senior member of Covington’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility Practice Group, Carolyn has co-led significant investigations into workplace culture, DEI issues, and reports of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment.
As an employment lawyer with over two decades of experience, Carolyn focuses on a wide range of compliance and regulatory matters for employers, including:
- Conducting audits regarding employee classification and pay equity
- Advising on employment issues arising in corporate transactions
- Strategic counseling on a wide range of issues including discrimination and harassment, wages and hours, worker classification, workplace accommodations and leave management, performance management and termination decisions, workplace violence, employment agreements, trade secrets, restrictive covenants, employee handbooks, and personnel policies
- Drafting employment contracts and offer letters, separation agreements, NDAs, and other employment agreements
- Advising on employee privacy matters, including under the California Consumer Privacy Act
- Providing guidance on use of AI in the workplace and development of related policies
- Leading anti-harassment and other workplace-related trainings, for employees, executives, and boards
Carolyn also works frequently with the firm’s white collar, privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups.
Artificial Intelligence & NYC Employers: New York City Seeks Publication of Proposed Rules That Would Regulate the Use of AI Tools in the Employment Context
Many employers and employment agencies have turned to artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools to assist them in making better and faster employment decisions, including in the hiring and promotion processes. The use of AI for these purposes has been scrutinized and will now be regulated in New York City. The New…
Continue Reading Artificial Intelligence & NYC Employers: New York City Seeks Publication of Proposed Rules That Would Regulate the Use of AI Tools in the Employment ContextNew Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration for Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Claims
A new law signed by President Biden brings significant changes to employers’ ability to require arbitration of certain disputes with employees and could lead to an increase in sexual assault and sexual harassment claims against employers in court. On March 3, 2022, President Biden signed into law the “Ending …
Continue Reading New Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration for Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Claims
California Reinstates and Updates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave for 2022
In a development that will sound familiar to employers, California has reinstated the requirement, which had expired last fall, to make available to employees up to 80 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave (“Supplemental Sick Leave”). The new measure, Senate Bill (“SB”) 114, was signed by Governor Newsom on February 9, 2022, and the requirement to provide the new sick leave went into effect on February 19. Employees may use the new sick leave retroactive to January 1, 2022.
New Supplemental Sick Leave Requirements
Following is an overview of the new and more expansive requirements under SB 114, which applies to employers with more than 25 employees.
Hours of Leave. Full-time employees are entitled to up to 80 total hours of Supplemental Sick Leave for specified reasons and divided into two 40-hour buckets, described below. Part-time employees are entitled to prorated leave equivalent to either their typical hours worked in a week, or seven multiplied by the average number of hours they have worked each day in the last six months.
The two buckets of leave are as follows:
First, full-time employees may use up to 40 hours of Supplemental Sick Leave when they are unable to work or telework for any of these reasons:
The employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period related to COVID-19, as defined by an order or guidelines of the California Department of Public Health, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or a local health officer who has jurisdiction over the workplace (if the employee is subject to more than one order/guideline, the employee may use Supplemental Sick Leave for the minimum quarantine or isolation period under the order or guidance that provides for the longest such minimum period);
Continue Reading California Reinstates and Updates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave for 2022
New California Law Restricts Confidentiality Provisions in Employment Settlement, Separation, and Nondisclosure Agreements
Governor Newsom recently signed into law SB 331 to impose a number of new restrictions on employment settlement, separation, and nondisclosure agreements. Here’s an overview of the new requirements, which apply to agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2022:
First, for settlement agreements involving claims of harassment or…
Continue Reading New California Law Restricts Confidentiality Provisions in Employment Settlement, Separation, and Nondisclosure Agreements
California’s AB 685 Expands Employers’ COVID-19 Notification Requirements, Effective January 1
California Employers Must Comply with New Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Workplace Safety Standards
Cal/OSHA promptly published a “Frequently Asked Questions” document (“FAQs”), a one-page summary of the ETS, and a Model Prevention Plan. These documents shed additional light on the ETS and how it might be enforced.
Below is an overview of the key takeaways from the new ETS and subsequent Cal/OSHA publications.
Basic Elements of the COVID-19 Prevention Program
The central feature of the ETS is the requirement that all employers implement a written COVID-19 prevention plan. At a high level, the prevention plan must include the following:
- Communication to employees about the employer’s COVID-19 prevention procedures;
- Screening of employees for COVID-19, although employees may be asked to evaluate their own symptoms before coming to work;
- Identification, evaluation, and correction of COVID-19 hazards;
- Physical distancing of at least six feet unless it is not possible;
- Use of face coverings, with only limited exceptions;
- Use of engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment as required to reduce transmission risk;
- Procedures to investigate and respond to COVID-19 cases in the workplace, including to verify cases and receive information on test results and symptom onset;
- COVID-19 training to employees;
- Testing of employees who are exposed to a COVID-19 case, and in the case of multiple infections or a major outbreak, implementation of regular workplace testing for employees in the exposed work areas;
- Exclusion of COVID-19 cases and exposed employees from the workplace until they are no longer an infection risk; and
- Maintenance of records of COVID-19 cases and reporting of serious illnesses and multiple cases to Cal-OSHA and local health departments.
Closer Look: Training Requirements
The ETS requires employers to provide training and information on the following topics:
- The employer’s COVID-19 policies and procedures;
- Information regarding COVID-19-related benefits;
- The fact that COVID-19 is an infectious disease that can be spread through the air when an infectious person talks, vocalizes, sneezes, coughs, or exhales, that COVID-19 may be spread through surface contact, and that an infected person may have no symptoms;
- Methods of physical distancing at least six feet apart and the importance of face coverings;
- The fact that particles containing the virus can travel more than six feet, especially indoors, so other controls, including face covers and hand hygiene, must also be used;
- The importance of frequent hand washing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds and the proper use of hand sanitizer;
- Proper use of face coverings and the fact that face coverings are not respiratory protective equipment; and
- COVID-19 symptoms, and the importance of obtaining a COVID-19 test and not coming to work if the employee has symptoms.
Closer Look: Investigation of COVID-19 Cases and Notification of Exposure
The ETS contains strict requirements for investigating COVID-19 cases in the workplace. Employers must determine the day and time the COVID-19 positive individual was last present and, to the extent possible, the date of the positive diagnosis or appearance of symptoms. Employers must determine which employees may have had a COVID-19 exposure by evaluating the activities of the COVID-19 case and all locations in the workplace the individual visited during the “high-risk exposure period.” The ETS defines the “high-risk exposure period” as either (1) from two days before they first develop symptoms until 10 days after the symptoms have first appeared, and 24 hours have passed with no fever, or (2) from two days before until ten days after the specimen for the individual’s first positive test for COVID-19 was collected.
Within one business day, the employer must notify all employees who may have had COVID-19 exposure (and any authorized representatives, such as their union), as well as any independent contractors or other employers present at the workplace during the high-risk exposure period. Importantly, the notice must not reveal the identity of the employee with COVID-19. The FAQs clarify that notification is required only to employees who were potentially exposed by being within 6 feet of a COVID-19 case for at least 15 minutes over a 24-hour period during the high-risk exposure period.Continue Reading California Employers Must Comply with New Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Workplace Safety Standards
California to Require Annual Pay Data Reporting to DFEH
…
Continue Reading California to Require Annual Pay Data Reporting to DFEH
New York Employees May Begin Using New Paid Sick Leave Benefits on January 1, 2021
…
Continue Reading New York Employees May Begin Using New Paid Sick Leave Benefits on January 1, 2021
New Law Expands California Family Rights Act
…
Continue Reading New Law Expands California Family Rights Act